mirror of
https://github.com/logos-storage/plonky2.git
synced 2026-01-05 15:23:06 +00:00
When we had a large field, we could just pick random shifts, and get disjoint cosets with high probability. With a 64-bit field, I think the probability of a collision is non-negligible (something like 1 in a million), so we should probably verify that the cosets are disjoint. If there are any concerns with this method (or if it's just confusing), I think it would also be reasonable to use the brute force approach of explicitly computing the cosets and checking that they're disjoint. I coded that as well, and it took like 80ms, so not really a big deal since it's a one-time preprocessing cost. Also fixes some overflow bugs in the inversion code.
158 lines
4.9 KiB
Rust
158 lines
4.9 KiB
Rust
use crate::field::field::Field;
|
|
use crate::gates::gate::GateRef;
|
|
use crate::generator::WitnessGenerator;
|
|
use crate::proof::{Hash, HashTarget, Proof};
|
|
use crate::prover::prove;
|
|
use crate::verifier::verify;
|
|
use crate::witness::PartialWitness;
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
|
|
pub struct CircuitConfig {
|
|
pub num_wires: usize,
|
|
pub num_routed_wires: usize,
|
|
pub security_bits: usize,
|
|
pub rate_bits: usize,
|
|
/// The number of times to repeat checks that have soundness errors of (roughly) `degree / |F|`.
|
|
pub num_checks: usize,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl Default for CircuitConfig {
|
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
|
CircuitConfig {
|
|
num_wires: 4,
|
|
num_routed_wires: 4,
|
|
security_bits: 128,
|
|
rate_bits: 3,
|
|
num_checks: 3,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl CircuitConfig {
|
|
pub fn num_advice_wires(&self) -> usize {
|
|
self.num_wires - self.num_routed_wires
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Circuit data required by the prover or the verifier.
|
|
pub struct CircuitData<F: Field> {
|
|
pub(crate) prover_only: ProverOnlyCircuitData<F>,
|
|
pub(crate) verifier_only: VerifierOnlyCircuitData,
|
|
pub(crate) common: CommonCircuitData<F>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl<F: Field> CircuitData<F> {
|
|
pub fn prove(&self, inputs: PartialWitness<F>) -> Proof<F> {
|
|
prove(&self.prover_only, &self.common, inputs)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn verify(&self) {
|
|
verify(&self.verifier_only, &self.common)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Circuit data required by the prover. This may be thought of as a proving key, although it
|
|
/// includes code for witness generation.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The goal here is to make proof generation as fast as we can, rather than making this prover
|
|
/// structure as succinct as we can. Thus we include various precomputed data which isn't strictly
|
|
/// required, like LDEs of preprocessed polynomials. If more succinctness was desired, we could
|
|
/// construct a more minimal prover structure and convert back and forth.
|
|
pub struct ProverCircuitData<F: Field> {
|
|
pub(crate) prover_only: ProverOnlyCircuitData<F>,
|
|
pub(crate) common: CommonCircuitData<F>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl<F: Field> ProverCircuitData<F> {
|
|
pub fn prove(&self, inputs: PartialWitness<F>) -> Proof<F> {
|
|
prove(&self.prover_only, &self.common, inputs)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Circuit data required by the prover.
|
|
pub struct VerifierCircuitData<F: Field> {
|
|
pub(crate) verifier_only: VerifierOnlyCircuitData,
|
|
pub(crate) common: CommonCircuitData<F>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl<F: Field> VerifierCircuitData<F> {
|
|
pub fn verify2(&self) {
|
|
verify(&self.verifier_only, &self.common)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Circuit data required by the prover, but not the verifier.
|
|
pub(crate) struct ProverOnlyCircuitData<F: Field> {
|
|
pub generators: Vec<Box<dyn WitnessGenerator<F>>>,
|
|
pub constant_ldes_t: Vec<Vec<F>>,
|
|
/// Transpose of LDEs of sigma polynomials (in the context of Plonk's permutation argument).
|
|
pub sigma_ldes_t: Vec<Vec<F>>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Circuit data required by the verifier, but not the prover.
|
|
pub(crate) struct VerifierOnlyCircuitData {}
|
|
|
|
/// Circuit data required by both the prover and the verifier.
|
|
pub(crate) struct CommonCircuitData<F: Field> {
|
|
pub(crate) config: CircuitConfig,
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) degree_bits: usize,
|
|
|
|
/// The types of gates used in this circuit.
|
|
pub(crate) gates: Vec<GateRef<F>>,
|
|
|
|
/// The largest number of constraints imposed by any gate.
|
|
pub(crate) num_gate_constraints: usize,
|
|
|
|
/// A commitment to each constant polynomial.
|
|
pub(crate) constants_root: Hash<F>,
|
|
|
|
/// A commitment to each permutation polynomial.
|
|
pub(crate) sigmas_root: Hash<F>,
|
|
|
|
/// The `{k_i}` valued used in `S_ID_i` in Plonk's permutation argument.
|
|
pub(crate) k_is: Vec<F>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl<F: Field> CommonCircuitData<F> {
|
|
pub fn degree(&self) -> usize {
|
|
1 << self.degree_bits
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn lde_size(&self) -> usize {
|
|
1 << (self.degree_bits + self.config.rate_bits)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn lde_generator(&self) -> F {
|
|
F::primitive_root_of_unity(self.degree_bits + self.config.rate_bits)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn constraint_degree(&self) -> usize {
|
|
self.gates.iter()
|
|
.map(|g| g.0.degree())
|
|
.max()
|
|
.expect("No gates?")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn quotient_degree(&self) -> usize {
|
|
self.constraint_degree() - 1
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn total_constraints(&self) -> usize {
|
|
// 2 constraints for each Z check.
|
|
self.config.num_checks * 2 + self.num_gate_constraints
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// The `Target` version of `VerifierCircuitData`, for use inside recursive circuits. Note that this
|
|
/// is intentionally missing certain fields, such as `CircuitConfig`, because we support only a
|
|
/// limited form of dynamic inner circuits. We can't practically make things like the wire count
|
|
/// dynamic, at least not without setting a maximum wire count and paying for the worst case.
|
|
pub struct VerifierCircuitTarget {
|
|
/// A commitment to each constant polynomial.
|
|
pub(crate) constants_root: HashTarget,
|
|
|
|
/// A commitment to each permutation polynomial.
|
|
pub(crate) sigmas_root: HashTarget,
|
|
}
|