Daniel Lubarov 2fd5fbbe01 Change from_biguint's behavior with extension fields ...

These appear to be unused for extension fields, so we're free to change the mapping without breaking anything.

As the TODO says, the mapping that's currently implemented doesn't seem natural or useful. It seems more natural to treat the `BigUint` as a base field element, potentially in a non-canonical form.

2022-08-19 09:21:10 -07:00

..

arch

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00

extension

Change from_biguint's behavior with extension fields

2022-08-19 09:21:10 -07:00

polynomial

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

batch_util.rs

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00

cosets.rs

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

fft.rs

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00

field_testing.rs

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

goldilocks_extensions.rs

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

goldilocks_field.rs

Change from_biguint's behavior with extension fields

2022-08-19 09:21:10 -07:00

interpolation.rs

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

inversion.rs

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

lib.rs

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00

ops.rs

Square trait (#409)

2021-12-30 12:11:02 -08:00

packable.rs

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00

packed.rs

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00

prime_field_testing.rs

field_types -> types (#583)

2022-06-27 12:24:09 -07:00

secp256k1_base.rs

Change from_biguint's behavior with extension fields

2022-08-19 09:21:10 -07:00

secp256k1_scalar.rs

Change from_biguint's behavior with extension fields

2022-08-19 09:21:10 -07:00

types.rs

Change from_biguint's behavior with extension fields

2022-08-19 09:21:10 -07:00

zero_poly_coset.rs

packed_field -> packed (#584)

2022-06-27 15:07:52 -07:00