plonky2/src/plonk_challenger.rs

296 lines
9.8 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
use crate::circuit_builder::CircuitBuilder;
use crate::field::field::Field;
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
use crate::hash::{permute, SPONGE_RATE, SPONGE_WIDTH};
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
use crate::proof::{Hash, HashTarget};
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
use crate::target::Target;
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
/// Observes prover messages, and generates challenges by hashing the transcript.
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct Challenger<F: Field> {
sponge_state: [F; SPONGE_WIDTH],
input_buffer: Vec<F>,
output_buffer: Vec<F>,
}
/// Observes prover messages, and generates verifier challenges based on the transcript.
///
/// The implementation is roughly based on a duplex sponge with a Rescue permutation. Note that in
/// each round, our sponge can absorb an arbitrary number of prover messages and generate an
/// arbitrary number of verifier challenges. This might appear to diverge from the duplex sponge
/// design, but it can be viewed as a duplex sponge whose inputs are sometimes zero (when we perform
/// multiple squeezes) and whose outputs are sometimes ignored (when we perform multiple
/// absorptions). Thus the security properties of a duplex sponge still apply to our design.
impl<F: Field> Challenger<F> {
pub fn new() -> Challenger<F> {
Challenger {
sponge_state: [F::ZERO; SPONGE_WIDTH],
input_buffer: Vec::new(),
output_buffer: Vec::new(),
}
}
pub fn observe_element(&mut self, element: F) {
// Any buffered outputs are now invalid, since they wouldn't reflect this input.
self.output_buffer.clear();
self.input_buffer.push(element);
}
pub fn observe_elements(&mut self, elements: &[F]) {
for &element in elements {
self.observe_element(element);
}
}
pub fn observe_hash(&mut self, hash: &Hash<F>) {
self.observe_elements(&hash.elements)
}
pub fn get_challenge(&mut self) -> F {
self.absorb_buffered_inputs();
if self.output_buffer.is_empty() {
// Evaluate the permutation to produce `r` new outputs.
self.sponge_state = permute(self.sponge_state);
self.output_buffer = self.sponge_state[0..SPONGE_RATE].to_vec();
}
self.output_buffer
.pop()
.expect("Output buffer should be non-empty")
}
pub fn get_2_challenges(&mut self) -> (F, F) {
(self.get_challenge(), self.get_challenge())
}
pub fn get_3_challenges(&mut self) -> (F, F, F) {
(
self.get_challenge(),
self.get_challenge(),
self.get_challenge(),
)
}
pub fn get_n_challenges(&mut self, n: usize) -> Vec<F> {
(0..n).map(|_| self.get_challenge()).collect()
}
2021-04-22 22:21:24 +02:00
pub fn get_hash(&mut self) -> Hash<F> {
Hash {
elements: [
self.get_challenge(),
self.get_challenge(),
self.get_challenge(),
self.get_challenge(),
],
}
}
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
/// Absorb any buffered inputs. After calling this, the input buffer will be empty.
fn absorb_buffered_inputs(&mut self) {
if self.input_buffer.is_empty() {
return;
}
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
for input_chunk in self.input_buffer.chunks(SPONGE_RATE) {
2021-04-12 10:38:07 +02:00
// Overwrite the first r elements with the inputs. This differs from a standard sponge,
// where we would xor or add in the inputs. This is a well-known variant, though,
// sometimes called "overwrite mode".
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
for (i, &input) in input_chunk.iter().enumerate() {
2021-04-12 10:38:07 +02:00
self.sponge_state[i] = input;
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
}
// Apply the permutation.
self.sponge_state = permute(self.sponge_state);
}
self.output_buffer = self.sponge_state[0..SPONGE_RATE].to_vec();
self.input_buffer.clear();
}
}
2021-04-23 12:35:19 -07:00
impl<F: Field> Default for Challenger<F> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self::new()
}
}
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
/// A recursive version of `Challenger`.
pub(crate) struct RecursiveChallenger {
sponge_state: [Target; SPONGE_WIDTH],
input_buffer: Vec<Target>,
output_buffer: Vec<Target>,
}
impl RecursiveChallenger {
pub(crate) fn new<F: Field>(builder: &mut CircuitBuilder<F>) -> Self {
let zero = builder.zero();
RecursiveChallenger {
sponge_state: [zero; SPONGE_WIDTH],
input_buffer: Vec::new(),
output_buffer: Vec::new(),
}
}
pub(crate) fn observe_element(&mut self, target: Target) {
// Any buffered outputs are now invalid, since they wouldn't reflect this input.
self.output_buffer.clear();
self.input_buffer.push(target);
}
pub(crate) fn observe_elements(&mut self, targets: &[Target]) {
for &target in targets {
self.observe_element(target);
}
}
pub fn observe_hash(&mut self, hash: &HashTarget) {
self.observe_elements(&hash.elements)
}
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
pub(crate) fn get_challenge<F: Field>(&mut self, builder: &mut CircuitBuilder<F>) -> Target {
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
self.absorb_buffered_inputs(builder);
if self.output_buffer.is_empty() {
// Evaluate the permutation to produce `r` new outputs.
self.sponge_state = builder.permute(self.sponge_state);
self.output_buffer = self.sponge_state[0..SPONGE_RATE].to_vec();
}
self.output_buffer
.pop()
.expect("Output buffer should be non-empty")
}
pub(crate) fn get_2_challenges<F: Field>(
&mut self,
builder: &mut CircuitBuilder<F>,
) -> (Target, Target) {
(self.get_challenge(builder), self.get_challenge(builder))
}
pub(crate) fn get_3_challenges<F: Field>(
&mut self,
builder: &mut CircuitBuilder<F>,
) -> (Target, Target, Target) {
(
self.get_challenge(builder),
self.get_challenge(builder),
self.get_challenge(builder),
)
}
pub(crate) fn get_n_challenges<F: Field>(
&mut self,
builder: &mut CircuitBuilder<F>,
n: usize,
) -> Vec<Target> {
(0..n).map(|_| self.get_challenge(builder)).collect()
}
/// Absorb any buffered inputs. After calling this, the input buffer will be empty.
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
fn absorb_buffered_inputs<F: Field>(&mut self, builder: &mut CircuitBuilder<F>) {
if self.input_buffer.is_empty() {
return;
}
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
for input_chunk in self.input_buffer.chunks(SPONGE_RATE) {
2021-04-12 10:38:07 +02:00
// Overwrite the first r elements with the inputs. This differs from a standard sponge,
// where we would xor or add in the inputs. This is a well-known variant, though,
// sometimes called "overwrite mode".
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
for (i, &input) in input_chunk.iter().enumerate() {
2021-04-12 10:38:07 +02:00
self.sponge_state[i] = input;
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
}
// Apply the permutation.
self.sponge_state = builder.permute(self.sponge_state);
}
self.output_buffer = self.sponge_state[0..SPONGE_RATE].to_vec();
self.input_buffer.clear();
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
use crate::circuit_builder::CircuitBuilder;
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
use crate::circuit_data::CircuitConfig;
use crate::field::crandall_field::CrandallField;
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
use crate::field::field::Field;
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
use crate::generator::generate_partial_witness;
use crate::plonk_challenger::{Challenger, RecursiveChallenger};
use crate::target::Target;
2021-04-02 14:00:26 -07:00
use crate::witness::PartialWitness;
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
#[test]
fn no_duplicate_challenges() {
type F = CrandallField;
let mut challenger = Challenger::new();
let mut challenges = Vec::new();
for i in 1..10 {
challenges.extend(challenger.get_n_challenges(i));
challenger.observe_element(F::rand());
}
let dedup_challenges = {
let mut dedup = challenges.clone();
dedup.dedup();
dedup
};
assert_eq!(dedup_challenges, challenges);
}
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
/// Tests for consistency between `Challenger` and `RecursiveChallenger`.
#[test]
fn test_consistency() {
type F = CrandallField;
// These are mostly arbitrary, but we want to test some rounds with enough inputs/outputs to
// trigger multiple absorptions/squeezes.
let num_inputs_per_round = vec![2, 5, 3];
let num_outputs_per_round = vec![1, 2, 4];
// Generate random input messages.
let inputs_per_round: Vec<Vec<F>> = num_inputs_per_round
.iter()
2021-05-06 15:14:43 +02:00
.map(|&n| F::rand_vec(n))
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
.collect();
2021-04-02 14:00:26 -07:00
let mut challenger = Challenger::new();
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
let mut outputs_per_round: Vec<Vec<F>> = Vec::new();
for (r, inputs) in inputs_per_round.iter().enumerate() {
challenger.observe_elements(inputs);
outputs_per_round.push(challenger.get_n_challenges(num_outputs_per_round[r]));
}
2021-04-02 15:29:21 -07:00
let config = CircuitConfig {
num_wires: 114,
2021-04-12 10:38:07 +02:00
num_routed_wires: 27,
2021-04-02 15:29:21 -07:00
..CircuitConfig::default()
};
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
let mut builder = CircuitBuilder::<F>::new(config);
let mut recursive_challenger = RecursiveChallenger::new(&mut builder);
2021-04-21 22:31:45 +02:00
let mut recursive_outputs_per_round: Vec<Vec<Target>> = Vec::new();
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
for (r, inputs) in inputs_per_round.iter().enumerate() {
2021-04-02 14:00:26 -07:00
recursive_challenger.observe_elements(&builder.constants(inputs));
2021-03-31 21:15:24 -07:00
recursive_outputs_per_round.push(
recursive_challenger.get_n_challenges(&mut builder, num_outputs_per_round[r]),
);
}
let circuit = builder.build();
let mut witness = PartialWitness::new();
generate_partial_witness(&mut witness, &circuit.prover_only.generators);
let recursive_output_values_per_round: Vec<Vec<F>> = recursive_outputs_per_round
.iter()
.map(|outputs| witness.get_targets(outputs))
.collect();
assert_eq!(outputs_per_round, recursive_output_values_per_round);
}
}