extract network simulator from tests

This commit is contained in:
Mark Spanbroek 2024-10-31 12:56:04 +01:00
parent e20da68dfc
commit 2d5f3721e4
2 changed files with 113 additions and 86 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
import ./basics
import mysticeti
import mysticeti/blocks
type Validator = mysticeti.Validator[MockSigning, MockHashing]
type Identity = mysticeti.Identity[MockSigning]
type SignedBlock = blocks.SignedBlock[MockSigning, MockHashing]
type NetworkSimulator* = object
identities: seq[Identity]
validators: seq[Validator]
proc init*(_: type NetworkSimulator, numberOfValidators = 4): NetworkSimulator =
let identities = newSeqWith(numberOfValidators, Identity.init())
let stakes = identities.mapIt( (it.identifier, 1/numberOfValidators) )
let committee = Committee.new(stakes)
let validators = identities.mapIt(!Validator.new(it, committee))
NetworkSimulator(identities: identities, validators: validators)
func identities*(simulator: NetworkSimulator): seq[Identity] =
simulator.identities
func validators*(simulator: NetworkSimulator): seq[Validator] =
simulator.validators
func nextRound*(simulator: NetworkSimulator) =
for validator in simulator.validators:
validator.nextRound()
proc propose*(simulator: NetworkSimulator, validatorIndex: int): ?!SignedBlock =
simulator.validators[validatorIndex].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
proc propose*(simulator: NetworkSimulator): ?!seq[SignedBlock] =
success simulator.validators.mapit(? it.propose(seq[Transaction].example))

View File

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import ../basics
import ../simulator
import mysticeti
import mysticeti/blocks
import mysticeti/hashing
@ -11,17 +12,10 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
type SignedBlock = blocks.SignedBlock[MockSigning, MockHashing]
type Hash = hashing.Hash[MockHashing]
var validators: seq[Validator]
var simulator: NetworkSimulator
setup:
let identities = newSeqWith(4, Identity.init())
let stakes = identities.mapIt( (it.identifier, 1/4) )
let committee = Committee.new(stakes)
validators = identities.mapIt(!Validator.new(it, committee))
proc nextRound =
for validator in validators:
validator.nextRound()
simulator = NetworkSimulator.init()
proc exchangeProposal(proposer, receiver: Validator, proposal: SignedBlock) =
if receiver != proposer:
@ -37,28 +31,27 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
proc exchangeProposals(exchanges: openArray[(int, seq[int])]): seq[SignedBlock] =
var proposals: seq[SignedBlock]
for (proposer, _) in exchanges:
let proposer = validators[proposer]
proposals.add(!proposer.propose(seq[Transaction].example))
proposals.add(!simulator.propose(proposer))
proposals.reverse()
for (proposer, receivers) in exchanges:
let proposer = validators[proposer]
let proposer = simulator.validators[proposer]
let proposal = proposals.pop()
for receiver in receivers:
let receiver = validators[receiver]
let receiver = simulator.validators[receiver]
exchangeProposal(proposer, receiver, proposal)
result.add(proposal)
proc exchangeProposals: seq[SignedBlock] =
var exchanges: seq[(int, seq[int])]
for proposer in validators.low..validators.high:
let receivers = toSeq[validators.low..validators.high]
for proposer in simulator.validators.low..simulator.validators.high:
let receivers = toSeq[simulator.validators.low..simulator.validators.high]
exchanges.add( (proposer, receivers) )
exchangeProposals(exchanges)
test "validators include blocks from previous round as parents":
let previous = exchangeProposals()
nextRound()
let proposal = !validators[0].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
simulator.nextRound()
let proposal = !simulator.propose(0)
for parent in previous:
check parent.blck.id in proposal.blck.parents
@ -71,23 +64,23 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[0, 1, 2, 3]
}
# second round: validator 0 cannot propose a block
nextRound()
let outcome = validators[0].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
simulator.nextRound()
let outcome = simulator.propose(0)
check outcome.isFailure
check outcome.error.msg == "not enough parents to represent > 2/3 stake"
test "by default received proposals are undecided":
let proposal = !validators[1].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
let proposal = !simulator.propose(1)
let round = proposal.blck.round
let author = proposal.blck.author
let checked = validators[0].check(proposal)
validators[0].receive(checked.blck)
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.undecided
let checked = simulator.validators[0].check(proposal)
simulator.validators[0].receive(checked.blck)
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.undecided
test "refuses proposals that are not signed by the author":
let proposal = !validators[1].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
let signedByOther = identities[2].sign(proposal.blck)
let checked = validators[0].check(signedByOther)
let proposal = !simulator.propose(1)
let signedByOther = simulator.identities[2].sign(proposal.blck)
let checked = simulator.validators[0].check(signedByOther)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason == "block is not signed by its author"
@ -96,7 +89,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
let otherCommittee = Committee.new({otherIdentity.identifier: 1/1})
let otherValidator = !Validator.new(otherIdentity, otherCommittee)
let proposal = !otherValidator.propose(seq[Transaction].example)
let checked = validators[0].check(proposal)
let checked = simulator.validators[0].check(proposal)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason == "block is not signed by a committee member"
@ -104,44 +97,44 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
let parents = exchangeProposals().mapIt(it.blck.id)
let badParentRound = 1'u64
let badParent = BlockId.new(CommitteeMember(0), badParentRound, Hash.example)
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
let blck = Block.new(
CommitteeMember(0),
round = 1,
parents & badparent,
seq[Transaction].example
)
let proposal = identities[0].sign(blck)
let checked = validators[1].check(proposal)
let proposal = simulator.identities[0].sign(blck)
let checked = simulator.validators[1].check(proposal)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason == "block has a parent from an invalid round"
test "refuses proposals that include a parent more than once":
let parents = exchangeProposals().mapIt(it.blck.id)
let badParent = parents.sample
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
let blck = Block.new(
CommitteeMember(0),
round = 1,
parents & badparent,
seq[Transaction].example
)
let proposal = identities[0].sign(blck)
let checked = validators[1].check(proposal)
let proposal = simulator.identities[0].sign(blck)
let checked = simulator.validators[1].check(proposal)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason == "block includes a parent more than once"
test "refuses proposals without >2/3 parents from the previous round":
let parents = exchangeProposals().mapIt(it.blck.id)
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
let blck = Block.new(
CommitteeMember(0),
round = 1,
parents[0..<2],
seq[Transaction].example
)
let proposal = identities[0].sign(blck)
let checked = validators[1].check(proposal)
let proposal = simulator.identities[0].sign(blck)
let checked = simulator.validators[1].check(proposal)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason ==
"block does not include parents representing >2/3 stake from previous round"
@ -155,10 +148,10 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
}
# second round: validator 0 creates block with parent that others didn't see
nextRound()
let proposal = !validators[0].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
simulator.nextRound()
let proposal = !simulator.propose(0)
# other validator will not accept block before it receives the parent
let checked = validators[1].check(proposal)
let checked = simulator.validators[1].check(proposal)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.incomplete
check checked.missing == @[parents[0].blck.id]
@ -172,7 +165,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
}
# for the second to the sixth round, validator 0 is down
for _ in 2..6:
for validator in validators[1..3]:
for validator in simulator.validators[1..3]:
validator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
1: @[1, 2, 3],
@ -180,24 +173,24 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[1, 2, 3]
}
# validator 1 cleans up old blocks
discard toSeq(validators[1].committed())
discard toSeq(simulator.validators[1].committed())
# validator 0 comes back online and creates block for second round
validators[0].nextRound()
let proposal = !validators[0].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
simulator.validators[0].nextRound()
let proposal = !simulator.propose(0)
# validator 1 accepts block even though parent has already been cleaned up
check validators[1].check(proposal).verdict == BlockVerdict.correct
check simulator.validators[1].check(proposal).verdict == BlockVerdict.correct
test "refuses proposals with a round number that is too high":
discard exchangeProposals()
validators[0].nextRound()
let proposal = !validators[0].propose(seq[Transaction].example)
let checked = validators[1].check(proposal)
simulator.validators[0].nextRound()
let proposal = !simulator.propose(0)
let checked = simulator.validators[1].check(proposal)
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason == "block has a round number that is too high"
test "refuses a proposal that was already received":
let proposals = exchangeProposals()
let checked = validators[1].check(proposals[0])
let checked = simulator.validators[1].check(proposals[0])
check checked.verdict == BlockVerdict.invalid
check checked.reason == "block already received"
@ -212,13 +205,13 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
let round = proposals[0].blck.round
let author = proposals[0].blck.author
# second round: voting
nextRound()
let votes = validators.mapIt(!it.propose(seq[Transaction].example))
validators[0].receive(validators[0].check(votes[1]).blck)
validators[0].receive(validators[0].check(votes[2]).blck)
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.undecided
validators[0].receive(validators[0].check(votes[3]).blck)
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.skip
simulator.nextRound()
let votes = !simulator.propose()
simulator.validators[0].receive(simulator.validators[0].check(votes[1]).blck)
simulator.validators[0].receive(simulator.validators[0].check(votes[2]).blck)
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.undecided
simulator.validators[0].receive(simulator.validators[0].check(votes[3]).blck)
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.skip
test "skips blocks that are ignored by blocks that are received later":
# first round: other validators do not receive proposal from first validator
@ -229,7 +222,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[0, 1, 2, 3]
}
# second round: first validator does not receive votes
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
1: @[1, 2, 3],
2: @[1, 2, 3],
@ -237,7 +230,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
}
# third round: first validator receives certificates, and also the votes
# from the previous round because they are the parents of the certificates
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
1: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
2: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
@ -245,7 +238,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
}
let round = proposals[0].blck.round
let author = proposals[0].blck.author
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.skip
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.skip
test "commits blocks that have certificates representing >2/3 stake":
# first round: proposing
@ -253,28 +246,28 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
let round = proposal.blck.round
let author = proposal.blck.author
# second round: voting
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
# third round: certifying
nextRound()
let certificates = validators.mapIt(!it.propose(seq[Transaction].example))
validators[0].receive(validators[0].check(certificates[1]).blck)
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.undecided
validators[0].receive(validators[0].check(certificates[2]).blck)
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.commit
simulator.nextRound()
let certificates = !simulator.propose()
simulator.validators[0].receive(simulator.validators[0].check(certificates[1]).blck)
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.undecided
simulator.validators[0].receive(simulator.validators[0].check(certificates[2]).blck)
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.commit
test "commits blocks that are certified by blocks that are received later":
# first round: proposing
let proposals = exchangeProposals()
# second round: first validator does not receive votes
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
1: @[1, 2, 3],
2: @[1, 2, 3],
3: @[1, 2, 3]
}
# third round: first validator does not receive certificates
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
1: @[1, 2, 3],
2: @[1, 2, 3],
@ -282,7 +275,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
}
# fourth round: first validator receives votes and certificates, because
# they are the parents of the blocks from this round
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
1: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
2: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
@ -290,22 +283,22 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
}
let round = proposals[0].blck.round
let author = proposals[0].blck.author
check validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.commit
check simulator.validators[0].status(round, author) == some SlotStatus.commit
test "can iterate over the list of committed blocks":
# blocks proposed in first round, in order of committee members
let first = exchangeProposals().mapIt(it.blck)
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
# blocks proposed in second round, round-robin order
let second = exchangeProposals().mapIt(it.blck).rotatedLeft(1)
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
# certify blocks from the first round
discard exchangeProposals()
check toSeq(validators[0].committed()) == first
check toSeq(simulator.validators[0].committed()) == first
# certify blocks from the second round
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
check toSeq(validators[0].committed()) == second
check toSeq(simulator.validators[0].committed()) == second
test "commits blocks using the indirect decision rule":
# first round: proposals
@ -316,7 +309,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[1, 2, 3]
}
# second round: voting
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
0: @[0, 1, 3],
1: @[0, 1, 3],
@ -324,22 +317,22 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[1, 3]
}
# third round: certifying
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
0: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
1: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
3: @[0, 1, 2, 3]
}
# fourth round: anchor
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
# fifth round: voting on anchor
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
# sixth round: certifying anchor
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
check toSeq(validators[0].committed()).contains(proposals[3].blck)
check toSeq(simulator.validators[0].committed()).contains(proposals[3].blck)
test "skips blocks using the indirect decision rule":
# Modelled after Figure 3f from the Mysticeti paper
@ -351,7 +344,7 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[1, 2, 3]
}
# second round: voting
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
0: @[0, 1, 3],
1: @[0, 1, 3],
@ -359,19 +352,19 @@ suite "Multiple Validators":
3: @[1, 3]
}
# third round: certifying
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals {
0: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
1: @[0, 1, 2, 3],
3: @[0, 1, 2, 3]
}
# fourth round: anchor
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
# fifth round: voting on anchor
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
# sixth round: certifying anchor
nextRound()
simulator.nextRound()
discard exchangeProposals()
check not toSeq(validators[0].committed()).contains(proposals[1].blck)
check not toSeq(simulator.validators[0].committed()).contains(proposals[1].blck)