mirror of
https://github.com/logos-messaging/specs.git
synced 2026-01-03 22:53:11 +00:00
Update enr.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
c89d99f9cf
commit
9c6f271bae
@ -8,26 +8,27 @@ contributors:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Abstract
|
## Abstract
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This RFC describes the usage of the ENR (Ethereum Node Records) format for [10/WAKU2](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/main/waku/standards/core/10/waku2.md) purposes.
|
This specification describes the usage of the ENR (Ethereum Node Records)
|
||||||
|
format for [10/WAKU2](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/main/waku/standards/core/10/waku2.md) purposes.
|
||||||
The ENR format is defined in [EIP-778](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-778) [[3]](#references).
|
The ENR format is defined in [EIP-778](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-778) [[3]](#references).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This RFC is an extension of EIP-778, ENR used in Waku v2 MUST adhere to both EIP-778 and 31/WAKU2-ENR.
|
This specification is an extension of EIP-778, ENR used in Waku MUST adhere to both EIP-778 and 31/WAKU2-ENR.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Motivation
|
## Motivation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
EIP-1459 with the usage of ENR has been implemented [[1]](#references) [[2]](#references) as a discovery protocol for Waku v2.
|
EIP-1459 with the usage of ENR has been implemented [[1]](#references) [[2]](#references) as a discovery protocol for Waku.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
EIP-778 specifies a number of pre-defined keys.
|
EIP-778 specifies a number of pre-defined keys.
|
||||||
However, the usage of these keys alone does not allow for certain transport capabilities to be encoded,
|
However, the usage of these keys alone does not allow for certain transport capabilities to be encoded,
|
||||||
such as Websocket.
|
such as Websocket.
|
||||||
Currently, Waku v2 nodes running in a Browser only support websocket transport protocol.
|
Currently, Waku nodes running in a browser only support websocket transport protocol.
|
||||||
Hence, new ENR keys need to be defined to allow for the encoding of transport protocol other than raw TCP.
|
Hence, new ENR keys need to be defined to allow for the encoding of transport protocol other than raw TCP.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Usage of Multiaddr Format Rationale
|
### Usage of Multiaddr Format Rationale
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One solution would be to define new keys such as `ws` to encode the websocket port of a node.
|
One solution would be to define new keys such as `ws` to encode the websocket port of a node.
|
||||||
However, we expect new transport protocols to be added overtime such as quic.
|
However, we expect new transport protocols to be added overtime such as quic.
|
||||||
Hence, this would only provide a short term solution until another RFC would need to be added.
|
Hence, this would only provide a short term solution until another specification would need to be added.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Moreover, secure websocket involves SSL certificates.
|
Moreover, secure websocket involves SSL certificates.
|
||||||
SSL certificates are only valid for a given domain and ip, so an ENR containing the following information:
|
SSL certificates are only valid for a given domain and ip, so an ENR containing the following information:
|
||||||
@ -47,10 +48,12 @@ Hence, it uses [multiaddr](https://github.com/multiformats/multiaddr) to format
|
|||||||
Directly storing one or several multiaddresses in the ENR would fix the issues listed above:
|
Directly storing one or several multiaddresses in the ENR would fix the issues listed above:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- multiaddr is self-describing and support addresses for any network protocol:
|
- multiaddr is self-describing and support addresses for any network protocol:
|
||||||
No new RFC would be needed to support encoding other transport protocols in an ENR.
|
No new specification would be needed to support encoding other transport protocols in an ENR.
|
||||||
- multiaddr contains both the host and port information, allowing the ambiguity previously described to be resolved.
|
- multiaddr contains both the host and port information, allowing the ambiguity previously described to be resolved.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## `multiaddrs` ENR key
|
## Wire Format
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### `multiaddrs` ENR key
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We define a `multiaddrs` key.
|
We define a `multiaddrs` key.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -122,9 +125,9 @@ then it is not needed to use the `multiaddrs` key.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Supported key type is `secp256k1` only.
|
Supported key type is `secp256k1` only.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the future, an extension of this RFC could be made to support other elliptic curve cryptography such as `ed25519`.
|
In the future, an extension of this specification could be made to support other elliptic curve cryptography such as `ed25519`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## `waku2` ENR key
|
### `waku2` ENR key
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We define a `waku2` field key:
|
We define a `waku2` field key:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -141,17 +144,17 @@ We define a `waku2` field key:
|
|||||||
If a protocol is not supported, the corresponding field MUST be set to `false`.
|
If a protocol is not supported, the corresponding field MUST be set to `false`.
|
||||||
Indicating positive support for any specific protocol is OPTIONAL,
|
Indicating positive support for any specific protocol is OPTIONAL,
|
||||||
though it MAY be required by the relevant application or discovery process.
|
though it MAY be required by the relevant application or discovery process.
|
||||||
- Flags marked as `undef` is not yet defined.
|
- Flags marked as `undef` is not yet defined.****
|
||||||
These SHOULD be set to `false` by default.
|
These SHOULD be set to `false` by default.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Usage
|
### Usage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- A Waku v2 node MAY choose to populate the `waku2` field for enhanced discovery capabilities,
|
- A Waku node MAY choose to populate the `waku2` field for enhanced discovery capabilities,
|
||||||
such as indicating supported protocols.
|
such as indicating supported protocols.
|
||||||
Such a node MAY indicate support for any specific protocol by setting the corresponding flag to `true`.
|
Such a node MAY indicate support for any specific protocol by setting the corresponding flag to `true`.
|
||||||
- Waku v2 nodes that want to participate in [Node Discovery Protocol v5](https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/discv5/discv5.md) [[4]](#references), however,
|
- Waku nodes that want to participate in [Node Discovery Protocol v5](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/main/waku/standards/core/33/discv5.md) [[4]](#references), however,
|
||||||
MUST implement the `waku2` key with at least one flag set to `true`.
|
MUST implement the `waku2` key with at least one flag set to `true`.
|
||||||
- Waku v2 nodes that discovered other participants using Discovery v5,
|
- Waku nodes that discovered other participants using Discovery v5,
|
||||||
MUST filter out participant records that do not implement this field or do not have at least one flag set to `true`.
|
MUST filter out participant records that do not implement this field or do not have at least one flag set to `true`.
|
||||||
- In addition, such nodes MAY choose to filter participants on specific flags (such as supported protocols),
|
- In addition, such nodes MAY choose to filter participants on specific flags (such as supported protocols),
|
||||||
or further interpret the `waku2` field as required by the application.
|
or further interpret the `waku2` field as required by the application.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user