up considerations:

This commit is contained in:
Sasha 2024-06-27 02:08:09 +02:00
parent d0827cfc4f
commit 3249e7d6e8
No known key found for this signature in database

View File

@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ category: Best Current Practice
tags: [informational] tags: [informational]
editor: Oleksandr Kozlov <oleksandr@status.im> editor: Oleksandr Kozlov <oleksandr@status.im>
contributors: contributors:
- Prem Chaitanya Prathi <prem@status.im>
- Danish Arora <danish@status.im>
--- ---
## Abstract ## Abstract
@ -37,7 +39,9 @@ As a useful metric to define and implement for determining quality of provided s
### Light Push ### Light Push
In case sending message failed - node should try to re-send message after some interval. - While sending message with Light Push - it is advised to use more than 1 peer in order to increase changes of delivering message.
- If sending message is failed to all of the peers - node should try to re-send message after some interval and continue doing so while OK response is received.
### Filter ### Filter
@ -51,13 +55,8 @@ In case sending message failed - node should try to re-send message after some i
## Security/Privacy Considerations ## Security/Privacy Considerations
If there are none, this section MAY state that fact. None of the mentioned recommendations incur privacy or security tradeoffs and in some cases increase k-anonymity (e.g having unique peers for Filter subscriptions).
This section MAY contain additional relevant information, e.g. an explanation as to why there are no security consideration for the respective document.
## Copyright ## Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
## References
A list of references.