up considerations:

This commit is contained in:
Sasha 2024-06-27 02:08:09 +02:00
parent d0827cfc4f
commit 3249e7d6e8
No known key found for this signature in database

View File

@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ category: Best Current Practice
tags: [informational]
editor: Oleksandr Kozlov <oleksandr@status.im>
contributors:
- Prem Chaitanya Prathi <prem@status.im>
- Danish Arora <danish@status.im>
---
## Abstract
@ -37,7 +39,9 @@ As a useful metric to define and implement for determining quality of provided s
### Light Push
In case sending message failed - node should try to re-send message after some interval.
- While sending message with Light Push - it is advised to use more than 1 peer in order to increase changes of delivering message.
- If sending message is failed to all of the peers - node should try to re-send message after some interval and continue doing so while OK response is received.
### Filter
@ -51,13 +55,8 @@ In case sending message failed - node should try to re-send message after some i
## Security/Privacy Considerations
If there are none, this section MAY state that fact.
This section MAY contain additional relevant information, e.g. an explanation as to why there are no security consideration for the respective document.
None of the mentioned recommendations incur privacy or security tradeoffs and in some cases increase k-anonymity (e.g having unique peers for Filter subscriptions).
## Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
## References
A list of references.