specs/standards/application/segmentation.md

234 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
title: Message Segmentation and Reconstruction
name: Message Segmentation and Reconstruction
tags: [waku-application, segmentation]
version: 0.1
status: draft
---
## Abstract
2026-04-28 21:32:42 +01:00
This specification defines an application-layer protocol for **segmentation** and **reconstruction** of messages carried over a transport/delivery service with a message-size limitation, when the original payload exceeds said limitation.
Applications partition the payload into multiple transport messages and reconstruct the original on receipt,
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
even when segments arrive out of order or up to a **predefined percentage** of segments are lost.
The protocol uses **ReedSolomon** erasure coding for fault tolerance.
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
All messages are wrapped in a `SegmentMessageProto`, including those that fit in a single segment.
Implementations **MAY** opt into a [backwards-compatible mode](#backwards-compatibility) that exempts small payloads from wrapping.
## Motivation
2026-04-28 21:32:42 +01:00
Many message transport and delivery protocols impose a maximum message size that restricts the size of application payloads.
For example, Waku Relay typically propagates messages up to **150 KB** as per [64/WAKU2-NETWORK - Message](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/64/network#message-size).
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
To support larger application payloads, a segmentation layer is required.
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
This specification enables larger messages by partitioning them into multiple envelopes and reconstructing them at the receiver.
Erasure-coded parity segments provide resilience against partial loss or reordering.
## Terminology
2025-10-27 10:15:02 +02:00
- **original payload**: the full application payload before segmentation.
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- **data segment**: one of the partitioned chunks of the original message payload.
- **parity segment**: an erasure-coded segment derived from the set of data segments.
- **segment message**: a wire-message whose `payload` field carries a serialized `SegmentMessageProto`.
- **`segmentSize`**: configured maximum size in bytes of each data segment's `payload` chunk (before protobuf serialization).
The key words **"MUST"**, **"MUST NOT"**, **"REQUIRED"**, **"SHALL"**, **"SHALL NOT"**, **"SHOULD"**, **"SHOULD NOT"**, **"RECOMMENDED"**, **"NOT RECOMMENDED"**, **"MAY"**, and **"OPTIONAL"** in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt).
## Wire Format
Each segmented message is encoded as a `SegmentMessageProto` protobuf message:
```protobuf
syntax = "proto3";
message SegmentMessageProto {
// Keccak256(original payload), 32 bytes
bytes entire_message_hash = 1;
// Data segment indexing
uint32 index = 2; // zero-based sequence number; valid only if segments_count > 0
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
uint32 segments_count = 3; // number of data segments
// Segment payload (data or parity shard)
bytes payload = 4;
// Parity segment indexing (used if segments_count == 0)
uint32 parity_segment_index = 5; // zero-based sequence number for parity segments
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
uint32 parity_segments_count = 6; // number of parity segments
}
```
**Field descriptions:**
- `entire_message_hash`: A 32-byte Keccak256 hash of the original complete payload, used to identify which segments belong together and verify reconstruction integrity.
- `index`: Zero-based sequence number identifying this data segment's position (0, 1, 2, ..., segments_count - 1).
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
- `segments_count`: Total number of data segments the original message was split into.
- `payload`: The actual chunk of data or parity information for this segment.
- `parity_segment_index`: Zero-based sequence number for parity segments.
- `parity_segments_count`: Total number of parity segments generated.
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
A message is either a **data segment** (when `segments_count > 0`) or a **parity segment** (when `segments_count == 0`).
### Validation
Receivers **MUST** enforce:
- `entire_message_hash.length == 32`
- **Data segments:**
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
`segments_count >= 1` **AND** `index < segments_count`
- **Parity segments:**
`segments_count == 0` **AND** `parity_segments_count > 0` **AND** `parity_segment_index < parity_segments_count`
No other combinations are permitted.
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
A `SegmentMessageProto` with `segments_count == 1` and `index == 0` is a valid single-segment data message: the `payload` field carries the entire original payload (see [Sending](#sending)).
## Segmentation
### Sending
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
To transmit a payload, the sender:
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- **MUST** compute a 32-byte `entire_message_hash = Keccak256(original_payload)`.
- **MUST** split the payload into one or more **data segments**,
each of size up to `segmentSize` bytes.
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
A payload of size ≤ `segmentSize` produces a single data segment (`segments_count == 1`).
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- **MAY** use ReedSolomon erasure coding at the predefined parity rate.
- Encode each segment as a `SegmentMessageProto` with:
- The `entire_message_hash`
- Either data-segment indices (`segments_count`, `index`) or parity-segment indices (`parity_segments_count`, `parity_segment_index`)
- The raw payload data
2026-04-28 21:32:42 +01:00
- Send each segment as an individual transport message according to the underlying transport protocol,
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
preserving application-level metadata (e.g., content topic).
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
This yields a deterministic wire format: every transmitted payload is a `SegmentMessageProto`. Implementations introducing segmentation into a deployment with peers that predate this specification **MAY** instead operate in [backwards-compatible mode](#backwards-compatibility).
### Receiving
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
Upon receiving a segmented message, the receiver:
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- **MUST** validate each segment according to [Wire Format → Validation](#validation).
- **MUST** cache received segments
- **MUST** attempt reconstruction when the number of available (data + parity) segments equals or exceeds the data segment count:
- Concatenating data segments if all are present, or
- Applying ReedSolomon decoding if parity segments are available.
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- **MUST** verify `Keccak256(reconstructed_payload)` matches `entire_message_hash`.
On mismatch,
the message **MUST** be discarded and logged as invalid.
- Once verified,
the reconstructed payload **SHALL** be delivered to the application.
- Incomplete reconstructions **SHOULD** be garbage-collected after a timeout.
---
2026-04-28 21:25:10 +01:00
## Backwards Compatibility
Implementations **MAY** support a **backwards-compatible mode**, intended for deployments where this specification is being introduced incrementally and some peers do not yet implement segmentation.
The mode is controlled by the `backwardsCompatible` configuration option, which defaults to `false`.
When `backwardsCompatible = true`, the [Sending](#sending) procedure is amended as follows:
- Payloads with size **`segmentSize`** **SHALL** be transmitted unmodified, i.e., not wrapped in `SegmentMessageProto`.
- Payloads exceeding `segmentSize` are wrapped and sent unchanged from [Sending](#sending).
A receiver that interoperates with senders operating in this mode **MUST** accept both wrapped and unwrapped payloads on the same channel.
A payload that does not parse as a valid `SegmentMessageProto` is treated as an unsegmented original payload and delivered directly to the application.
**Trade-off.**
This mode preserves on-the-wire compatibility with peers that cannot decode `SegmentMessageProto`, at the cost of the deterministic wire format described in [Sending](#sending).
Once all peers in a deployment implement this specification, `backwardsCompatible` **SHOULD** be set to `false`.
---
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
## Implementation Suggestions
### ReedSolomon
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
Implementations that apply parity **SHALL** use fixed-size shards of length `segmentSize`.
The last data chunk **MUST** be padded to `segmentSize` for encoding.
The reference implementation uses **nim-leopard** (Leopard-RS) with a maximum of **256 total shards**.
### Storage / Persistence
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
Segments **MAY** be persisted (e.g., SQLite) and indexed by `entire_message_hash` and by sender. Sender MAY be authenticated, this is out of scope of this spec.
Implementations **SHOULD** support:
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- Duplicate detection and idempotent saves
- Completion flags to prevent duplicate processing
- Timeout-based cleanup of incomplete reconstructions
- Per-sender quotas for stored bytes and concurrent reconstructions
### Configuration
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
- `segmentSize` — maximum size in bytes of each data segment's payload chunk (before protobuf serialization).
**REQUIRED** parameter, configurable by the client.
- `parityRate` — fraction of parity shards relative to data shards.
Configurable by the client. Defaults to **0.125** (12.5%).
- `maxTotalSegments` — maximum number of total shards (data + parity) per message.
Implementation-specific parameter, fixed. The reference implementation uses **256**.
2025-10-21 17:36:57 +03:00
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
**Reconstruction capability:**
With the predefined parity rate,
reconstruction is possible if **all data segments** are received or if **any combination of data + parity** totals at least `dataSegments` (i.e., up to the predefined percentage of loss tolerated).
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
**API simplicity:**
Libraries **SHOULD** require only `segmentSize` from the application for normal operation.
2026-04-28 18:33:06 +01:00
2025-10-19 15:56:33 +03:00
### Support
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- **Language / Package:** Nim;
**Nimble** package manager
2026-04-28 21:32:42 +01:00
- **Intended for:** application-layer use over any transport with message-size constraints
---
## Security Considerations
### Privacy
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
`entire_message_hash` enables correlation of segments that belong to the same original message but does not reveal content.
Traffic analysis may still identify segmented flows.
### Integrity
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
Implementations **MUST** verify the Keccak256 hash post-reconstruction and discard on mismatch.
### Denial of Service
To mitigate resource exhaustion:
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- Limit concurrent reconstructions and per-sender storage
- Enforce timeouts and size caps
- Validate segment counts (≤ 256)
2026-04-28 21:32:42 +01:00
- Consider rate-limiting at the transport layer (for example, via [17/WAKU2-RLN-RELAY](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/17/rln-relay) on Waku)
### Compatibility
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
Nodes that do **not** implement this specification cannot reconstruct large messages.
---
2025-10-21 17:36:57 +03:00
## Deployment Considerations
2025-10-21 17:36:57 +03:00
**Overhead:**
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
- Bandwidth overhead ≈ the predefined parity rate from parity (if enabled)
- Additional per-segment overhead ≤ **100 bytes** (protobuf + metadata)
2025-10-21 17:36:57 +03:00
**Network impact:**
2026-04-28 21:32:42 +01:00
- Larger messages increase transport traffic and storage;
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
operators **SHOULD** consider policy limits
---
## References
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
1. [10/WAKU2 Waku](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/10/waku2)
2. [11/WAKU2-RELAY Relay](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/11/relay)
2025-10-21 17:36:57 +03:00
3. [14/WAKU2-MESSAGE Message](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/14/message)
4. [64/WAKU2-NETWORK](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/64/network#message-size)
2025-10-22 12:03:00 +03:00
5. [nim-leopard](https://github.com/status-im/nim-leopard) Nim bindings for Leopard-RS (ReedSolomon)
6. [Leopard-RS](https://github.com/catid/leopard) Fast ReedSolomon erasure coding library
2025-10-21 17:36:57 +03:00
7. [RFC 2119](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt) Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels