RLNP2P was merged in ACZ

This commit is contained in:
fryorcraken.eth 2024-02-09 10:49:54 +11:00
parent 389733bacb
commit a09897d5c1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: A82ED75A8DFC50A4

View File

@ -527,15 +527,15 @@ Enable a web app to use Waku to request wallet signature for authentication and
2. Continue QA work: improve test coverage from a RFC and Status usage angle, including interoperability test run 2. Continue QA work: improve test coverage from a RFC and Status usage angle, including interoperability test run
between nwaku and go-waku, and once done, js-waku and nwaku. Considerations should be made to also include status-go (DST). between nwaku and go-waku, and once done, js-waku and nwaku. Considerations should be made to also include status-go (DST).
3. Simulate or model status-go behaviour based on the result of Waku large scale simulations. (DST) 3. Simulate or model status-go behaviour based on the result of Waku large scale simulations. (DST)
4. Secure RLN credentials: for example in [CryptKeeper](https://github.com/CryptKeeperZK) (RLNP2P) 4. Secure RLN credentials: for example in [CryptKeeper](https://github.com/CryptKeeperZK) (ACZ)
5. Support in improving RLN usage on resource-restricted devices (RLNP2P) 5. Support in improving RLN usage on resource-restricted devices (ACZ)
6. Secure way of delegating acquisition of memberships as described in [RLN Design Patterns](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/issues/102) (RLNP2P) 6. Secure way of delegating acquisition of memberships as described in [RLN Design Patterns](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/issues/102) (ACZ)
7. Fee structure for RLN memberships: come up with a comprehensive strategy for RLN memberships, perhaps following 7. Fee structure for RLN memberships: come up with a comprehensive strategy for RLN memberships, perhaps following
the [NFT-like approach](https://forum.vac.dev/t/ens-like-nfts-for-rln/243). Strategy should consider cost structures the [NFT-like approach](https://forum.vac.dev/t/ens-like-nfts-for-rln/243). Strategy should consider cost structures
like Harberger tax, dev/node compensation and project sustainability, security, etc (RLNP2P, Tokenomics, Smart Contract) like Harberger tax, dev/node compensation and project sustainability, security, etc (ACZ, Tokenomics, Smart Contract)
8. RLN contract audited, reviewed and deployed to mainnet (RLNP2P, Smart Contract) 8. RLN contract audited, reviewed and deployed to mainnet (ACZ, Smart Contract)
9. Investigate feasibility/risks for RLN on L2, recommend a specific L2 if any (RLNP2P, Tokenomics, Smart Contract) 9. Investigate feasibility/risks for RLN on L2, recommend a specific L2 if any (ACZ, Tokenomics, Smart Contract)
10. Risk/attack analysis for RLN. How do we recover after an attack? (RLNP2P, Tokenomics) 10. Risk/attack analysis for RLN. How do we recover after an attack? (ACZ, Tokenomics)
11. Deliver WebRTC Direct support in nim-libp2p (P2P) 11. Deliver WebRTC Direct support in nim-libp2p (P2P)
12. Deliver WebTransport support in nim-libp2p (P2P) 12. Deliver WebTransport support in nim-libp2p (P2P)
13. Deliver a cryptographic protocol to enable setting up a secure channel for 1:1 and private group chat purposes from 13. Deliver a cryptographic protocol to enable setting up a secure channel for 1:1 and private group chat purposes from