mirror of
https://github.com/logos-messaging/pm.git
synced 2026-01-02 14:13:09 +00:00
Updates
This commit is contained in:
parent
e276089b0c
commit
5129d89f0f
@ -7,15 +7,19 @@ Chat SDK needs an slimmed down version of Status to perform testing.
|
||||
Features such as Wallet, Communities, etc, can add complexity and noise to the testing process.
|
||||
To test the ChatSDK effectively a version of the Status application which only implements the required features for private chat are needed.
|
||||
|
||||
The application should include the least amount of complexity while also effectively mitigating integration risks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
1. Ability to create Identity
|
||||
1. Create new conversations from introduction
|
||||
1. View Conversations
|
||||
1. Create new conversations from introductions
|
||||
1. View existing Conversations
|
||||
|
||||
1. Ability to send messages
|
||||
1. Ability to send messages to a Conversation
|
||||
1. Ability to receive messages automatically in the background
|
||||
1. Notifications are posted when receiving new messages.
|
||||
1. Encoding/encryption errors are logged and retrievable.
|
||||
1. Missing messages are displayed to user.
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability
|
||||
|
||||
@ -24,6 +28,8 @@ To test the ChatSDK effectively a version of the Status application which only i
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
|
||||
### Supportability
|
||||
1. App runs on Mobile
|
||||
1. App runs on Desktop
|
||||
|
||||
**+ (Privacy, Anonymity, Censorship-Resistance, Deployments)**
|
||||
|
||||
@ -32,15 +38,22 @@ To test the ChatSDK effectively a version of the Status application which only i
|
||||
To complete ChatSDK integration without issues, Status needs to prepare the existing code base.
|
||||
Focus is on creating abstractions and planning for breaking changes.
|
||||
|
||||
The ChatSDK takes a different approach to managaging conversations, and is incompatible with the existing application. To smooth the integration process starting on these adaptations now, provides the fastest integration possible.
|
||||
The ChatSDK takes a different approach to managaging conversations, and is incompatible with the existing application.
|
||||
Preparing the code base in advance will reduce the integration time, and allow for faster feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
To better offer support, it would be helpful for Waku to understand Status' approach to product decisions during this migration.
|
||||
- Will Users be required to create new accounts? or Will the new Keytypes be bound to existing Identities?
|
||||
- Will Conversations be migrated? Or will users be expected to create new conversations to use new features?
|
||||
- What is the minimum amount of time users should be given to update before older versions are locked out?
|
||||
|
||||
### Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
1. Isolate chat internals from application so they can be replaced effectively.
|
||||
1. Stored user level conversations are isolated/inpedendant from the transport used.
|
||||
1. Add facade to isolate dependency on Waku.
|
||||
1. Stored user level conversations are isolated/independant from the transport used.
|
||||
1. Add facade to isolate Waku dependency from existing codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability
|
||||
1. Conversation encryption/encoding mechanism can be updated with a single line code change.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
@ -48,7 +61,7 @@ The ChatSDK takes a different approach to managaging conversations, and is incom
|
||||
|
||||
### Supportability
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document strategy for managing conversations through the upgrade.
|
||||
1. Document strategy for managing existing conversations through the upgrade.
|
||||
1. Document strategy for identity binding between new and old accounts.
|
||||
|
||||
**+ (Privacy, Anonymity, Censorship-Resistance, Deployments)**
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user