mirror of
https://github.com/logos-messaging/pm.git
synced 2026-01-05 23:53:12 +00:00
Merge 39a660009dc3590e89e39610220366144d718b45 into 08dbb8dcc942404fc92cdce406777e51ce2bfdac
This commit is contained in:
commit
0d761a0189
@ -1,3 +1,85 @@
|
||||
# Waku's requirements on Status
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: list specific areas of concerns and risks
|
||||
## Minimal Test UI
|
||||
|
||||
Chat SDK needs an slimmed down version of Status to perform testing.
|
||||
|
||||
Features such as Wallet, Communities, etc, can add complexity and noise to the testing process.
|
||||
To test the ChatSDK effectively a version of the Status application which only implements the required features for private chat are needed.
|
||||
|
||||
The application should include the least amount of complexity while also effectively mitigating integration risks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
1. Ability to create multiple Identities/Accounts
|
||||
1. Ability to sign-in with single chosen Identity.
|
||||
1. Ability to view received messages by conversation.
|
||||
1. Newly created inbound conversations are displayed.
|
||||
1. New Outbound conversations can be created.
|
||||
1. Ability to send messages to an existing Conversation.
|
||||
1. Ability to receive messages automatically in the background.
|
||||
1. Notifications are posted when receiving new messages.
|
||||
1. Encoding/encryption errors are logged and retrievable.
|
||||
1. Missing messages in a conversation are visible to the user.
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability
|
||||
|
||||
### Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
|
||||
### Supportability
|
||||
|
||||
1. App runs on Mobile
|
||||
1. App runs on Desktop
|
||||
|
||||
### + (Privacy, Anonymity, Censorship-Resistance, Deployments)
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Preparation
|
||||
|
||||
To complete ChatSDK integration without issues, Status needs to prepare the existing code base.
|
||||
Focus is on creating abstractions and planning for breaking changes.
|
||||
|
||||
The ChatSDK takes a different approach to managing conversations, and is incompatible with the existing application.
|
||||
Preparing the code base in advance will reduce the integration time, and allow for faster feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
To better offer support, it would be helpful for Waku to understand Status' approach to product decisions during this migration.
|
||||
- Will Users be required to create new accounts? or Will the new Keytypes be bound to existing Identities?
|
||||
- Will Conversations be migrated? Or will users be expected to create new conversations to use new features?
|
||||
- What is the minimum amount of time users should be given to update before older versions are locked out?
|
||||
|
||||
### Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
1. Isolate chat internals from application so they can be replaced effectively.
|
||||
1. Stored user level conversations are isolated/independant from the transport used.
|
||||
1. Add facade to isolate Waku dependency from existing codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability
|
||||
1. Conversation encryption/encoding mechanism can be updated with a single line code change.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
|
||||
### Supportability
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document strategy for managing existing conversations through the upgrade.
|
||||
1. Document strategy for identity binding between new and old accounts.
|
||||
|
||||
**+ (Privacy, Anonymity, Censorship-Resistance, Deployments)**
|
||||
|
||||
## Status Fleets Ownership
|
||||
|
||||
[Placeholder - Cannot find an references to this Conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability
|
||||
|
||||
### Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
|
||||
### Supportability
|
||||
|
||||
**+ (Privacy, Anonymity, Censorship-Resistance, Deployments)**
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user