diff --git a/2025H1-SUMMARY.md b/2025H1-SUMMARY.md index 77cdcda..53684c7 100644 --- a/2025H1-SUMMARY.md +++ b/2025H1-SUMMARY.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ - Understood working and limitation of existing Status Private Chat protocol. Line out work to use Waku securely and at scale (RLN) and various security limitations and inadequacies - Delivered new peer discovery protocol (rendezvous) to enable further scaling of Waku applications in terms of number of nodes and node capabilities. - Integrated local DoS protection mechanisms to all Waku service node, fleet and Status Desktop apps. -- Bd achievements TODO https://discord.com/channels/1110799176264056863/1111541918585868348/1381801780949553183 +- BD achievements TODO https://discord.com/channels/1110799176264056863/1111541918585868348/1381801780949553183 - Greatly improved RLN UX with onchain tree reducing resource costs on Waku Nodes, actioning lessons from previous dogfooding in The Waku Network. Deployed on Linea Sepolia. - Defined and delivered first economic cost for RLN membership acquisition via stable coin deposits; including a web app for membership management to allow further dogfooding https://rln.waku.org/. - Defined first incentivisation mechanism including payment and local reputation (PoC incomplete as of H1) @@ -96,9 +96,7 @@ ## ⚠️ Keys Risks & Controls -TODO: CLARIFY WITH LEONARD -> I assume this was for H1 risk and how we mitigated? The section seems to be present focus when the document is a H1 summary. -> Wouldn't it be more interesting to discuss whether any risks were realized and if the mitigation strategy were effective? +TODO: Risks you mitigated and how you did that. | Risk | Control | |----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|