Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
r4bbit 40c5be49bc refactor(certora): introduce shared.spec to reuse helper functions
We have a couple of helper functions redefined in multiple spec files.
This commit introduces a `shared.spec` that provides such functions.

The file is then imported in other spec files, so we can make use of the
functions there.

Closes #87
2024-09-19 14:35:08 +02:00
r4bbit 5dec595a20 feat(StakeManager): implement multiplier points estimation
This commit introduces the internal accounting logic for accrueing
multiplier points, that will later be used to determine how many
experience points an account is eligible to.

The majority of the work here was done by @3esmit.
2024-09-10 08:51:35 +02:00
r4bbit 4a04b46e14 refactor(StakeManager): initialMP -> bonusMP, currentMP -> totalMP
After discussing this offline, we've decided that the naming of these
properties was misleading. This commit performs the following changes:

- `account.initialMP` becomes `account.bonusMP`
- `account.currentMP` becomes `account.totalMP`

Rationale:

`initialMP` indicates that this is an immutable field which is not the
case as in scenarios where accounts increase the `lock()` time, they'll
also increase their bonus multiplier (`initialMP`).

`currentMP` was misleading in combination with `initialMP`. Really what
it reflects is the total multiplier points of an account **including**
its bonus multiplier points.
2024-06-25 13:13:02 -03:00
r4bbit d18df07b28 refactor(StakeManager): make function names more descriptive
Some of the functions on our contracts were confusing.
This commit changes them so they describe what they actually do.
2024-06-20 15:48:27 -03:00
r4bbit 6182d9508c chore(certora): upgrade certora-cli to 7.0.7
This upgrade certora-cli on CI to version 7.0.7 which no longer requires
the `STORAGE` keyword in storage hooks.
2024-03-20 10:59:35 +01:00
r4bbit f946e55759 chore(StakeManager.spec): add rule to ensure MP 1to1 ratio 2024-03-12 17:18:58 +01:00
r4bbit 7e2f675115 chore(StakeManager.spec): add invariant greater lock time -> more MPs 2024-03-12 17:14:30 +01:00
r4bbit f1c1de7993 chore(StakeManager.spec): add two more MP related invariants
This adds two more invariants about multiplier points:

1. Initial multiplier points can never be less than an account's balance
2. Current multiplier points can never be less than initial MP
2024-03-12 16:56:50 +01:00
r4bbit decd8a281d chore(StakeManager.spec): add MPCantBeGreaterThanMaxMP invariant
This commit introduces an invariant that ensures the generated
multiplier points can never be greater than the max boost multiplier
points.

See discussion in #80

Closes #80
2024-03-12 16:30:23 +01:00
r4bbit 544cc42f34 fix(StakeManager.spec): use filtered invariants for vacuous rules
This refactors the spec to no longer rely on the `simplification()`
but instead filter out the vacuous rules from the get go.

Using the `simplification()` previously was needed so that the prover
will ignore cases that revert by design. This made some invariants
vacuous.

Having vacuous rules or invariants is still considered a failure, so to
make get prover happy, we're using filtered invariants instead which
renders the `simplification` obsolete.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit da007451a4 fix(StakeManager): ensure `currentEpoch` is `0` when migrating
A previous manager can only migrate once, because the migration address
is locked in. A **new** manager is always aware of its previous manager.

This means, when a migration happens and is initialized, we know for
sure it's always the first time this is happening.

We probably don't want a migration to take place if the new manager has
already processed epochs, so we're adding a check that its
`currentEpoch` must be `0`.

This also ensures one of its invariants isn't violated:

`epochsOnlyIncrease` and `highEpochsAreNull`.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit 0708bdd846 fix(StakeManager.spec): change `simplification()` to assume no prev manager
`simplification()` is used to have some rules make certain assumptions
so that they can pass. We need an additional simplification, stating
that `oldManager == address(0)`.

This means `oldManager` isn't set, meaning no `migrationInitialize()`
and similar functions have a non-reverting path.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit e9f0077488 fix(StakeManager.spec): ensure `revertsWhenNoMigration` passes
The were changes in the contracts that caused this rule to fail.
Namely `migrateTo` shouldn't be reverting so this as been removed from
the rule and `transferNonPending` has been added as it was missing.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit e723464245 fix(StakeManager.spec): make `epochOnlyIncreases` rule pass
This was failing due to `migrationInitialize()` allowing for resetting
or decreasing a `StakeManager`s `currentEpoch`.

In practice, however, this is not possible because a new manager can
only be called from an old manager and the old manager can only migrate
once. So if `migrationInitialize()` is called from an old manager, we
can safely assume it's the first time this is called, meaning the new
manager's `currentEpoch` must be `0` at this point in time.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
Nurit Dor e1bd0f31f8 chore: add cerora rules for `totalSupplyBalance` ghost rule 2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit 1c52edbbd9 chore(Certora specs): comment out purposefully failing rule
We've introduced a rule that finds counter examples for all functions
that changes balances. This rule will always fail by definition, so
we're commenting it out to get CI green again.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit d7ab130d30 fix(Certora specs): make specs compile again
There have been a bunch of breaking changes in the staking contract that
resulted in our specs not compiling.

This commit fixes this, however it does not yet ensure the prover is
satisfied.
2024-03-01 15:31:14 -03:00
Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt 03bc6559ae fix: StakeManager migration fixes and certora rules 2024-02-20 09:08:00 +01:00
Nurit Dor 14248a285b chore: certora setup for stakemanager and vault 2024-02-20 09:04:23 +01:00
r4bbit cf7a8b6574
chore(ci): add certora CI integration (#40) 2023-12-11 15:10:41 +01:00