mirror of https://github.com/logos-co/staking.git
fix(certora): exclude `stake()` from rule that checks account balance
change The rule is failing since we've removed the `lockUntil > 0` check in `stake` and `processAccount` is no longer used in `stake()`. The rule requires `lockUntil > 0` so it will always fail there and can't find a non-reverting cases (which makes the rule pass). The reason it hasn't happened before was because: The rule required account.lockUntil > 0 Stake required lockUntil > 0 || account balance == 0 Also this commit adds an invariant: add invariant that account balance == 0 => accountMP == 0
This commit is contained in:
parent
978b4dcf30
commit
41b43621f7
|
@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ invariant highEpochsAreNull(uint256 epochNumber)
|
|||
m -> !requiresPreviousManager(m) && !requiresNextManager(m)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
invariant accountMPIsZeroIfBalanceIsZero(address addr)
|
||||
to_mathint(getAccountBalance(addr)) == 0 => to_mathint(getAccountCurrentMultiplierPoints(addr)) == 0
|
||||
filtered {
|
||||
f -> f.selector != sig:migrateFrom(address,bool,StakeManager.Account).selector
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
invariant InitialMPIsNeverSmallerThanBalance(address addr)
|
||||
to_mathint(getAccountBonusMultiplierPoints(addr)) >= to_mathint(getAccountBalance(addr))
|
||||
filtered {
|
||||
|
@ -126,6 +132,7 @@ rule stakingMintsMultiplierPoints1To1Ratio {
|
|||
|
||||
requireInvariant InitialMPIsNeverSmallerThanBalance(e.msg.sender);
|
||||
requireInvariant CurrentMPIsNeverSmallerThanInitialMP(e.msg.sender);
|
||||
requireInvariant accountMPIsZeroIfBalanceIsZero(e.msg.sender);
|
||||
|
||||
require getAccountLockUntil(e.msg.sender) <= e.block.timestamp;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ hook Sstore accounts[KEY address addr].balance uint256 newValue (uint256 oldValu
|
|||
https://prover.certora.com/output/40726/055d52bc67154e3fbea330fd7d68d36d/?anonymousKey=73030555b4cefe429d4eed6718b9a7e5be3a22c8
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rule checkAccountProcessedBeforeStoring(method f) filtered {
|
||||
f -> !requiresPreviousManager(f) && !requiresNextManager(f)
|
||||
f -> !requiresPreviousManager(f) && !requiresNextManager(f) && f.selector != sig:stake(uint256,uint256).selector
|
||||
} {
|
||||
address account;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue