mirror of
https://github.com/logos-co/roadmap.git
synced 2025-02-02 11:25:27 +00:00
Waku: update RLN milestone as per new roadmap
This commit is contained in:
parent
1bf0348a30
commit
712d17fc76
@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ date: 2024-06-04
|
||||
- [End-to-end reliability protocol](waku/milestones/2024-e2e-reliability-protocol.md)
|
||||
- [Static Sharding - dedicated shards](waku/milestones/2024-static-sharding-dedicated-shards.md)
|
||||
- [Bandwidth optimization and protocol review](waku/milestones/2024-bandwidth-optimization-and-protocol-review.md)
|
||||
- [Scale up number of Communities](waku/milestones/2024-scale-one-to-one-chat-poc.md)
|
||||
- [Scale up number of Communities](waku/milestones/2024-scale-number-of-communities.md)
|
||||
- [Nwaku in Status Desktop (Relay, *nix)](waku/milestones/2024-nwaku-in-status-desktop.md)
|
||||
- [Scale 1:1 chat messages PoC](waku/milestones/2024-scale-one-to-one-chat-poc.md)
|
||||
- [RLN Mainnet](waku/milestones/2024-rln-mainnet.md)
|
||||
|
68
content/waku/milestones/2024-rln-mainnet.md
Normal file
68
content/waku/milestones/2024-rln-mainnet.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: RLN Mainnet
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- waku-milestone
|
||||
date: 2024-09-07
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# [RLN Mainnet](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/milestone/34)
|
||||
|
||||
Due Date: 2024-12-31
|
||||
|
||||
Once complemented, the economical behaviour of RLN will have been specified, implemented and discussed with the Status team.
|
||||
An implementation of RLN for light clients will also be done, to demonstrate RLN’s UX with onchain Merkle tree.
|
||||
Finally, the smart contract will be deployed on mainnet.
|
||||
|
||||
It will be then possible to design the usage of RLN in Status 1:1 chats.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliverable: [RLNv2 in nwaku](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/issues/204)
|
||||
|
||||
Improved flexibility of the rate limit (from 1 msg/epoch to N msg/epoch), providing better dimensioning for bandwidth capping.
|
||||
Moving from RLNv1 to RLNv2 to allow better bandwidth dimensioning in the network. This will allow a message allocation per hour or day per registered publisher, providing better statistical guarantees for network bandwidth usage.
|
||||
Note this only concerns native libraries using nwaku.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliverable: [Maturing RLN variables/parameters revision (staking, contract/chain, token) - roadmap](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/issues/205)
|
||||
|
||||
*A review of RLN security parameters and functionality in preparation for mainnet deployment.*
|
||||
Analyse RLN deployment in the Waku proto-network and evaluate its DoS protection performance as well as review with the Status app team the potential cost mode of RLN:
|
||||
- Should staking be introduced, especially to improve resilience against adversarial membership registrations?
|
||||
- Should slashing be introduced or does the existing gossipsub scoring method provide enough protection?
|
||||
- Which chain or L2 should we target for memberships?
|
||||
- What token should be used?
|
||||
- Do we need a combination of msg/sec and msg allocation/day rate limiting?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliverable: Implement RLN smart contract for paid, multilevel memberships
|
||||
|
||||
This deliverable is an output of Maturing RLN variables/parameters revision (staking, contract/chain, token) - roadmap.
|
||||
|
||||
Once we have matured the RLN parameters and specified a minimal set of (smart contract) features for a production-ready membership mechanism, the proposed smart contract changes must be implemented. This also implies implementing each feature in the different Waku clients as needed.
|
||||
Initial discussion indicates that our minimal feature set include:
|
||||
Paid RLN memberships
|
||||
RLN memberships at different rate-limit tiers
|
||||
Expiry of memberships to prevent hogging
|
||||
Support for RLN in resource-restricted clients, i.e. lightweight proof generation and validation
|
||||
The exact set of features is to be defined in a RFC, as output of Maturing RLN variables/parameters revision (staking, contract/chain, token) - roadmap.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliverable: RLN contract revision and audit
|
||||
|
||||
Once a minimal set of smart contract features for RLN has been implemented, the contract needs to be thoroughly revised (and possibly audited) by a group of experts before it can be used in production.
|
||||
The Waku team will rely on Vac/SC to proceed/organise the smart contract review and audit
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliverable: Deploy RLN smart contract to a L2 mainnet
|
||||
|
||||
The RLN smart contract should be deployed to a Layer 2 mainnet.
|
||||
|
||||
A first step here may be to deploy to a Layer 2 testnet first. However, we could deploy a test contract to a Layer 2 mainnet directly if it's easier. (A contract used for testing does not have to be productionised/audited before deployment to mainnet.)
|
||||
|
||||
This deliverable tracks all steps to deployment of a production version of the contract to a L2.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliverable: Public dogfooding RLNaaS web app
|
||||
Second part of original scope of dogfooding web app.
|
||||
|
||||
One of the proposed strategies to roll out RLN for Status 1:1 chats is to use RLNaaS where a service node attaches RLN proof for light clients. This would enable a roll out of RLN without impacting UX or UI.
|
||||
|
||||
However, this would decrease the security that RLN brings, so we need to further test this topology to better under risks and mitigate them, or drop this approach.
|
||||
|
||||
Deliver a gamified web app to allow further dogfooding of RLN. This should build on the previously delivered (internal) web app to collect reliability and performance metrics.
|
||||
This may include capturing new metrics from the fleets to gather data and assess the viability of RLNaaS from this experiment.
|
@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Scale 1 to 1 chat messages PoC
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- waku-milestone
|
||||
date: 2024-09-07
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[Milestone Scale 1:1 chat messages PoC](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/milestone/34)
|
||||
|
||||
Due Date: 2024-11-30
|
||||
|
||||
Improved flexibility of the rate limit (from 1 msg/epoch to N msg/epoch), providing better dimensioning for bandwidth capping.
|
||||
|
||||
Moving from RLNv1 to RLNv2 to allow better bandwidth dimensioning in the network. This will allow a message allocation per hour or day per registered publisher, providing better statistical guarantees for network bandwidth usage.
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable: [RLNv2 in nwaku](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/issues/204)
|
||||
|
||||
Improved flexibility of the rate limit (from 1 msg/epoch to N msg/epoch), providing better dimensioning for bandwidth capping.
|
||||
Moving from RLNv1 to RLNv2 to allow better bandwidth dimensioning in the network. This will allow a message allocation per hour or day per registered publisher, providing better statistical guarantees for network bandwidth usage.
|
||||
Note this only concerns native libraries using nwaku.
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable: [Maturing RLN variables/parameters revision (staking, contract/chain, token) - roadmap](https://github.com/waku-org/pm/issues/205)
|
||||
|
||||
*A review of RLN security parameters and functionality in preparation for mainnet deployment.*
|
||||
Analyse RLN deployment in the Waku proto-network and evaluate its DoS protection performance as well as review with the Status app team the potential cost mode of RLN:
|
||||
- Should staking be introduced, especially to improve resilience against adversarial membership registrations?
|
||||
- Should slashing be introduced or does the existing gossipsub scoring method provide enough protection?
|
||||
- Which chain or L2 should we target for memberships?
|
||||
- What token should be used?
|
||||
- Do we need a combination of msg/sec and msg allocation/day rate limiting?
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user