mirror of https://github.com/logos-co/roadmap.git
vac roadmap update
Signed-off-by: ksr <kaiserd@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a43e90b9fd
commit
311bed7f4f
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
title: "Network Privacy Stack - Stakeholder Privacy"
|
title: "Network Privacy Stack - Stakeholder Privacy"
|
||||||
|
description: "Main goal: finding in-protocol (carnot) mechanisms to solve the problem of timing attacks."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
## `vac:dr:consesus:nomos:stake-privacy-timing-attacks`
|
## `vac:dr:consesus:nomos:stake-privacy-timing-attacks`
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
@ -33,10 +34,9 @@ gantt
|
||||||
This milestone comprises component 3 of the [Nomos network pivacy stack](https://www.notion.so/Network-Privacy-Stack-2a2a86647d2a42ca9de6940c55f99851)
|
This milestone comprises component 3 of the [Nomos network pivacy stack](https://www.notion.so/Network-Privacy-Stack-2a2a86647d2a42ca9de6940c55f99851)
|
||||||
in the context of consensus privacy:
|
in the context of consensus privacy:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The main goal of this work is finding in-protocol (carnot) mechanisms to solve the problem of timing attacks
|
The main goal of this work is finding in-protocol (carnot) mechanisms to solve the problem of timing attacks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Upper layer protections of the network from the sender: Simplest solution to prevent attacks to private PoS: minimum age of transaction for inclusion
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Upper layer protections of the network from the sender: Simplest solution to prevent attacks to private PoS: minimum age of transaction for inclusion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Certain types of timing attacks and network observation to identify high stake participants are already being worked on at the network level.
|
Certain types of timing attacks and network observation to identify high stake participants are already being worked on at the network level.
|
||||||
However, this problem should be considered at the PoS/consesus layer as well.
|
However, this problem should be considered at the PoS/consesus layer as well.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue