logos-co
/
nomos-specs
mirror of https://github.com/logos-co/nomos-specs.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial python translation of specification (#1) 

* Added spec file
Translate to python except unhappy path

* Fix pr review comments
Cleanup
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Sanchez 2023-03-21 13:09:28 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 0f0ccc3487
commit 4f6c297815
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 347 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

347
carnot/spec.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
# Carnot Specification
This is the pseudocode specification of the Carnot consensus algorithm.
In this specification we will omit any cryptographic material, block validity and proof checks. A real implementation is expected to check those before hitting this code.
In addition, all types can be expected to have their invariants checked by the type contract, e.g. in an instance of type `Qc::Aggregate` the `high_qc` field is always the most recent qc among the aggregate qcs and the code can skip this check.
'Q:' is used to indicate unresolved questions.
Notation is loosely based on CDDL.
## Messages
A critical piece in the protocol, these are the different kind of messages used by participants during the protocol execution.
* `Block`: propose a new block
* `Vote`: vote for a block proposal
* `Timeout`: propose to jump to a new view after a proposal for the current one was not received before a configurable timeout.
### Block
(sometimes also called proposal)
We assume an unique identifier of the block can be obtained, for example by hashing its contents. We will use the `id()` function to access the identifier of the current block.
We also assume that a unique tree order of blocks can be determined, and in particular each participant can identify the parent of each block. We will use the `parent()` function to access such parent block.
```python
@dataclass
class Block:
view: View
qc: Qc
```
##### View
A monotonically increasing number (considerations about the size?)
```python
View = int
```
##### Qc
There are currently two different types of QC:
```python
Qc = StandardQc | AggregateQc
```
###### Standard
Q: there can only be one block on which consensus in achieved for a view, so maybe the block field is redundant?
```python
class StandardQc:
view: View
block: Id
```
###### Aggregate
`high_qc` is `Qc` for the most recent view among the aggregated ones. The rest of the qcs are ignored in the rest of this algorithm.
We assume there is a `block` function available that returns the block for the Qc. In case of a standard qc, this is trivially qc.block, while for aggregate it can be obtained by accessing `high_qc`. `high_qc` is guaranteed to be a 'Standard' qc.
```python
class AggregateQc:
view: View
qcs: List[Qc]
def high_qc(self) -> Qc:
return max(self.qcs, key=lambda qc: qc.view)
```
##### Id
undef, will assume a 32-byte opaque string
```python
Id: bytes = bytearray(32)
```
### Vote
A vote for `block` in `view`
qc is the optional field containing the QC built by root nodes from 2/3 + 1 votes from their child committees and forwarded the the next view leader.
```python
class Vote:
block: Id
view: View
voter: Id
qc: Option[Qc]
```
### Timeout
```python
class Timeout:
view: View
high_qc: Qc
```
## Local Variables
Participants in the protocol are expected to mainting the following data in addition to the DAG of received proposal:
* `current_view`
* `local_high_qc`
* `latest_committed_view`
* `collection`: TODO rename
```python
CURRENT_VIEW: View
LOCAL_HIGH_QC: Qc
LATEST_COMMITTED_VIEW: View
COLLECTION: Q?
```
## Available Functions
The following functions are expected to be available to participants during the execution of the protocol:
* `leader(view)`: returns the leader of the view.
* `reset_timer()`: resets timer. If the timer expires the `timeout` routine is triggered.
* `extends(block, ancestor)`: returns true if block is descendant of the ancestor in the chain.
* `download(view)`: Download missing block for the view.
getMaxViewQC(qcs): returns the qc with the highest view number.
* `member_of_leaf_committee()`: returns true if the participant executing the function is in the leaf committee of the committee overlay.
* `member_of_root_com()`: returns true if the participant executing the function is member of the root committee withing the tree overlay.
* `member_of_internal_com()`: returns truee if the participant executing the function is member of internal committees within the committee tree overlay
* `child_committee(participant)`: returns true if the participant passed as argument is member of the child committee of the participant executing the function.
* `supermajority(votes)`: the behavior changes with the position of a participant in the overlay:
* Root committee: returns if the number of distinctive signers of votes for a block in the child committee is equal to the threshold.
* `leader_supermajority(votes)`: returns if the number of distinct voters for a block is 2/3 + 1 for both children committees of root committee and overall 2/3 + 1
* `morethanSsupermajority(votes)`: returns if the number of distinctive signers of votes for a block is is more than the threshold: TODO
* `parent_committe`: return the parent committee of the participant executing the function withing the committee tree overlay. Result is undefined if called from a participant in the root committee.
<!-- #####Supermajority of child votes is 2/3 +1 votes from members of child committees
#####Supermajority for the qc to be included in the block, should have at least 2/3+1 votes from both children of the root committee and overal 2/3 +1
#####combined votes of the root committee+its child committees. -->
## Core functions
These are the core functions necessary for the Carnot consensus protocol, to be executed in response of incoming messages, except for `timeout` which is triggered by a participant configurable timer.
### Receive block
```python3
def receive_block(block: Block):
if block.id() is known or block.view <=LATEST_COMMITTED_VIEW:
return
# Recursively make sure that we process blocks in order
if block.parent() is missing:
parent: Block = download(block.parent())
receive(parent)
if safe_block(block):
# This is not in the original spec, but
# let's validate I have this clear.
assert block.view == current_view
update_high_qc(block.qc)
vote = create_vote()
if member_of_leaf_committee():
if member_of_root_committee():
send(vote, leader(current_view + 1))
else:
send(vote, parent_commitee())
current_view += 1
reset_timer()
try_to_commit_grandparent(block)
```
##### Auxiliary functions
```python
def safe_block(block: Block):
match block.qc:
case StandardQc() as standard:
# Previous leader did not fail and its proposal was certified
if standard.view <= LATEST_COMMITED_BLOCK:
return False
# this check makes sure block is not old
# and the previous leader did not fail
return block.view >= LATEST_COMMITED_BLOCK and block.view == (standard.view + 1)
case AggregateQc() as aggregated_qc:
# Verification of block.aggQC.highQC along
# with signature or block.aggQC.signature is sufficient.
# No need to verify each qc inside block.aggQC
if aggregated_qc.high_qc().view <= LATEST_COMMITED_BLOCK:
return False
return block.view >= CURRENT_VIEW
# we ensure by construction this extends the block in
# high_qc since that is by definition the parent of this block
```
```python
# Commit a grand parent if the grandparent and
# the parent have been added during two consecutive views.
def try_to_commit_grand_parent(block: Block):
parent = block.parent()
grand_parent = parent.parent()
return (
parent.view == (grand_parent.view + 1) and
isinstance(block.qc, (StandardQc, )) and # Q: Is this necessary?
isinstance(parent.qc, (StandardQc, )) # Q: Is this necessary?
)
# Update last_committed_view ?
```
```python
# Update the latest certification (qc)
def update_high_qc(qc: Qc):
match qc:
# Happy case
case Standard() as qc:
# TODO: revise
if qc.view > LOCAL_HIGH_QC.view:
LOCAL_HIGH_QC = qc
# Q: The original pseudocde checked for possilbly
# missing view and downloaded them, but I think
# we already dealt with this in receive_block
# Unhappy case
case Aggregate() as qc:
high_qc = qc.high_qc()
if high_qc.view != LOCAL_HIGH_QC.view:
LOCAL_HIGH_QC = high_qc
# Q: same thing about missing views
```
### Receive Vote
Q: this whole function needs to be revised
```python
def receive_vote(vote: Vote):
if vote.block is missing:
block = download(vote.block)
receive(block)
# Q: we should probably return if we already received this vote
if member_of_internal_com() and not_member_of_root():
if child_commitee(vote.voter):
COLLECTION[vote.block].append(vote)
else:
# Q: not returning here would mean it's extremely easy to
# trigger building a new vote in the following branches
return
if supermajority(COLLECTION[vote.block]):
# Q: should we send it to everyone in the committee?
self_vote = build_vote()
send(self_vote, parent_committee)
# Q: why here?
current_view += 1
reset_timer()
# Q: why do we do this here?
try_to_commit_grand_parent(block)
if member_of_root():
if child_commitee(vote.voter):
COLLECTION[vote.block].append(vote)
else:
# Q: not returning here would mean it's extremely easy to
# trigger building a new vote in the following branches
return
if supermajority(COLLECTION[vote.block]):
# Q: The vote to send is not the one received but
# the one build by this participant, right?
self_vote = build_vote();
qc = build_qc(collection[vote.block])
self_vote.qc=qc
send(self_vote, leader(current_view + 1))
# Q: why here?
current_view += 1
reset_timer()
# Q: why here?
try_to_commit_grandparent(block)
# Q: this means that we send a message for every incoming
# message after the threshold has been reached, i.e. a vote
# from a node in the leaf committee can trigger
# at least height(tree) messages.
if morethanSsupermajority(collection[vote.block]):
# just forward the vote to the leader
# Q: But then childcommitte(vote.voter) would return false
# in the leader, as it's a granchild, not a child
send(vote, leader(current_view + 1))
if leader(view): # Q? Which view? CURRENT_VIEW or vote.view?
if vote.view < CURRENT_VIEW - 1:
return
# Q: No filtering? I can just create a key and vote?
COLLECTION[vote.block].append(vote)
if supermajority(collection[vote.block]):
qc = build_qc(collection[vote.block])
block = build_block(qc)
broadcast(block)
```
### Receive NewView
```Ruby
# Failure Case
Func receive(newView) {
# download the missing block
if newview.highQC.block missing {
let block = download(new_view.high_qc.block)
receive(block)
}
# It's an old message. Ignore it.
if newView.view < current_view {
return
}
# Q: this was update_high_qc_and_view(new_view.high_qc, Null)
update_high_qc(new_view.high_qc)
if member_of_internal_com() {
collection[newView.view].append(newView)
if supermajority[newView.view]{
newViewQC=buildQC(collection[newView.view])
if member_of_root(){
send(newViewQC, leader(view+1))
curView++
} else {
send(newViewQC, parent_committee())
}
}
}
}
```
### Timeout
```python
def timeout():
raise NotImplementedError
```
We need to make sure that qcs can't be removed from aggQc when going up the tree