Files
logos-protocol/cpp/implementations
Dario Gabriel LipicarandClaude Opus 5 8f0c60fe17 fix(protocol): a burst that goes quiet must not wait for a call that never comes
378d889 retired finished waiters, but from ONE site: the async-call spawn path.
So whatever finishes after the LAST spawn is never reaped, and a module that
bursts and then goes idle parks it all until the handle dies. Measured on
378d889, one handle, 2000 concurrent calls, every one delivered:

    after 2000 completed calls, IDLE:  m_waiters=1428   rss=+24.17 MiB
    after ONE further call:            m_waiters=1      rss=+ 1.92 MiB

The unbounded-per-call class was gone; this is what it left behind, and the
second line is the whole diagnosis — the corpses go the instant anything calls
again, so the reaper works and simply never runs. LogosAPIConsumer caches one
handle per module and never releases it between calls, so "bursts, then quiet"
is not a corner case: it is a UI that fans out on a refresh and then waits for
the user.

A finishing waiter now reaps the OTHER finished waiters before publishing
itself, so a burst drains as it completes. Same probe, same workload:

    after 2000 completed calls, IDLE:  m_waiters=1      rss=+ 1.88 MiB

THE BOUND IS ONE, NOT ZERO, and by construction rather than by luck: a waiter
can only reap OTHERS (a thread cannot join itself), so the last one to finish
has nobody behind it to collect it. Anything that publishes after the final
reap survives too, which is why 12 runs of the probe gave 1 eleven times and 2
once. Those go on the next call, or in teardown. Retention now tracks neither
call count nor peak concurrency — the sequential and in-flight-16 numbers move
from "15 -> 16 waiters" to "1 -> 1" — and the memory figures are unchanged
against 378d889 where they were already flat: 10k sequential +0.00 MiB, 10k at
16 in flight +0.06 MiB, 30k +0.09 MiB, and 10k through the production C ABI
(one lp_client, N lp_invoke_async) +0.09 MiB / 10 B per call, the same as
378d889 reported.

THE ORDER IS THE SAFETY ARGUMENT. Reap first, publish last, never the reverse:

  * Publishing is what makes a waiter joinable BY ANOTHER WAITER. Reaping first
    keeps that relation one-way — unpublished threads join published ones,
    published ones join nobody — so it has no cycles. Inverted, two waiters
    publishing in the same instant can each take the other's thread out of
    m_waiters and then join it; both are already out of the registry, so
    teardown does not even wait for them. Built that variant: pthread_join
    detects the cycle and throws, the half-drained thread vector then destroys
    a still-joinable thread, and the process aborts — the EXISTING hammer
    (ReapingRacesPublishingWithoutDeadlocking) catches it 5 runs out of 5, with
    the stack showing two waiters inside FinishOnExit joining each other.
  * While a waiter is unpublished it is still in m_waiters, so a concurrent
    teardown joins it and the object cannot be destroyed under the reap. Once
    published, a reaper may take its thread out of the map and release() may
    `delete this` — and a reaper on the CALLER's thread (the spawn path) is one
    teardown neither knows about nor waits for, so a post-publish touch of
    m_waiterMu is a use-after-free on a member mutex. That path needs a caller
    still issuing calls while another thread releases, which this class already
    treats as caller-side UB, so it is stated as an argument; the cycle above is
    what the tests actually demonstrate.

Two corrections to 378d889, which this change makes load-bearing rather than
cosmetic. NOT amended into it — it is pushed, and a commit that misstates its
own reasoning is better read alongside the correction than rewritten.

  * plain_logos_object.h:107-109 said reapFinishedWaiters() is "called on every
    async spawn ... and from stopAndJoinWaiters()". It is not, and never was,
    called from stopAndJoinWaiters(): teardown does its own id-independent
    brute-force join, which is precisely why it needs no cooperation from the
    reaper. Harmless behaviourally, wrong in a mechanism whose entire argument
    is who joins what and when. The comment now names the two real callers —
    the spawn path and, as of this commit, every waiter on its way out.

  * 378d889's message presented "the join is outside the lock" as THE property
    that prevents the reaper deadlock, "proven by construction" by its hammer.
    That is overstated, in a way that would let the guarantee be refactored
    away with the suite still green. TWO independent properties each suffice:
    joining only PUBLISHED ids (a published waiter never needs m_waiterMu
    again, so it cannot be the thread being shut out), and joining outside the
    lock. The hammer only wedges when BOTH are gone. Measured, on top of this
    change: the variant that joins under the lock but KEEPS the published-only
    filter passes ReapingRacesPublishingWithoutDeadlocking in 293/297/290ms
    across three runs and the whole reaping suite besides, while the variant
    that joins everything under the lock trips the watchdog at 60s. So a later
    "simplification" that moves the join inside the lock would ship green. Both
    properties are kept, and the comment now says which one the test is
    actually testing.

The TODO above the waiter still stands: the real fix is to fold the wait into
the shared Asio io_context and have no thread per pending RPC at all. This
makes the interim honest; it does not replace it.

Verified by running, each check first shown to FAIL on unfixed code:

  * Retention: the burst probe above, plus a committed regression test that
    reads m_waiters out of the live object through the explicit-instantiation
    access hole. 800 concurrent completed calls, then IDLE with NO further
    call: 1 waiter left, 20 runs out of 20. On 378d889 the same test leaves
    610 of 800 and fails. The pre-existing sequential and in-flight tests are
    unchanged and still pass.
  * The UAF stays closed — the check that matters most here, because this adds
    an object access late in the waiter's life. 9 reaping/teardown-race tests
    plus the 7-test teardown suite clean under macOS Guard Malloc (ASan is
    unusable on this box: it hangs in its own initializer). DETECTOR VALIDATED
    both ways: turning teardown's join back into a detach SIGSEGVs under Guard
    Malloc on the release-during-call hammer (exit 139), and the specific
    inversion this change risks — reaping AFTER publishing — aborts as
    described above.
  * No deadlock: reap-vs-publish hammered 20x (1600 calls in 40 overlapping
    bursts each), plus 60 rounds of teardown landing from another thread while
    the tail of a burst retires itself, plus 6x600-call bursts checking that
    LIVE OS threads (task_threads, which counts wedges and not corpses) come
    back to baseline every round. Clean; the watchdog names the cause if it
    ever is not.
  * Exactly-once on all four paths — normal, timeout, cancellation, deferred
    sentinel — counted per call. Each detector validated with a broken build:
    dropping the cancelled callback fails 4 tests, dropping the timeout one
    fails its test, and double-delivering the normal/deferred arm fails those.
  * Teardown latency unchanged from 378d889: 1-25ms with an in-flight 8000ms
    call and 0ms mid-defer across 5 runs, against 2-21ms / 0ms on that commit —
    the same one-wait-slice (25ms) bound, since a waiter's extra work happens
    after it has stopped waiting.
  * Full suite 282/282 three times, `nix build .#tests` green,
    CallErrorAfterAcquireTest hammered 40x clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 22:17:27 -03:00
..