mirror of
https://github.com/logos-co/logos-protocol.git
synced 2026-08-27 12:01:15 +00:00
Dario LipicarandClaude Opus 5
3da8de93df
The signedness/range check in #31 went one step too far: it rejected 3.0 for an `int`, not just 3.7. That broke four long-standing test_basic_module_cpp cases (`addInts(3.0, 4.0)`, `echoInt(42.0)`, `isPositive(5.0)`, `twoArgs(hi, 3.0)`) which pass a whole-valued double where the contract declares an integer. They are right and the check was wrong. JSON does not distinguish 3 from 3.0, and this codec already says so in the other direction — Codec<double> accepts an integral number because "2 and 2.0 are the same value to JSON, and every encoder that sees a whole double may emit either". The two directions have to agree. It also matters in practice rather than in principle: logoscore's CLI types its arguments by parsing, so `logoscore call m addInts 3.0 4.0` produces JSON floats. Refusing them rejects a caller over a spelling of the same number. So a float decodes as an integer when it has no fractional part and fits; 3.7 is still refused, which is what the original change was actually for. Bounds are strict on the upper end for the same reason as the QJsonValue guard: double(int64max) rounds UP to 2^63, so `<=` would admit a value the cast cannot represent. verified: test-modules 176/176 with the four cases green again, and the conformance matrix unchanged at 170 pass / 2 xfail — hostile/int/fractional still expects dispatch_failed and gets it. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>