mirror of
https://github.com/logos-blockchain/research.git
synced 2026-08-07 03:33:33 +00:00
cad2bf51b2
Second review pass, three findings. Pending cancellations were a set, so a node that proposed twice before its next cover emission forfeited only one and then over-emitted relative to its quota -- the precise uniformity cover traffic exists to preserve. Now a multiset. The timeline drew the block proposer uniformly while quota.py used a stake- weighted lottery, so the two halves of the cover-traffic model disagreed. The timeline now takes the stake array. Concentration is visible in the bookkeeping: a dominant proposer wins most proposals but rarely draws a cover slot to forfeit, so cancellations redeemed fall from 107 to 28 -- the unredeemed backlog being exactly the over-emission the stake ceiling describes. data/report_numbers.py claimed to print every quoted value but covered only sections 3.1-3.5 and 3.8. Extended to 3.9 correlated churn, 3.10 blending, mixing and the quota ceiling, 3.11 the release designs, and the 3.4 attribution bracket; the claim in data/README is corrected to say what it actually does. Neither model fix moves a published number: the proposer identity does not enter blending, mixing or timing, and repeat proposals are rare at the reported rates. Two regression tests pin both. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>