Marcin Pawlowski 8d1ede2807
Redundancy and coherence pass on the merged report
Read as one document rather than four, with an overlap scan over all
146 prose paragraphs.

- §2.2 and Appendix A both carried the full derivation of the on-chain
  `f`-rounding offset (37% trigram overlap) — an artefact of the parts
  having to stand alone. §2.2 now states the fact, the ~1.010 factor,
  and that this report's estimator is unbiased, then defers the
  derivation and the spec-change sizing to Appendix A. Residual overlap
  is the unavoidable shared notation.

- §7's figure-location note was corrected to the measured placement
  (Appendix B and C hold figB1/figB2 and fig17/fig18/fig21; it had said
  §9) and extended to fig30–fig35.

Checked and found clean: no verbatim repeated sentences; no other
paragraph pair above 20% overlap that is not a vocabulary coincidence;
no directional reference ("above"/"below") inverted by moving §7–§8
after §6 — the three flagged were numeric comparisons, not navigation;
all 33 TOC entries resolve and every top-level section is listed; 47
anchors and 37 figures resolve in both markdown and rendered HTML.

Tests: 209 passed. ruff clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 10:45:16 +02:00
..
2026-07-31 10:04:10 +02:00