61 lines
2.4 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

import dataclasses
import pytest
from pd.config import SimConfig, SweepConfig
def test_key_covers_every_field():
fields = [f.name for f in dataclasses.fields(SimConfig)]
assert len(SimConfig().key()) == len(fields)
base = SimConfig()
for name in fields:
cur = getattr(base, name)
alt = {"n_nodes": 2000, "degree": 4, "blend_hops": 2, "max_blend_delay": 5,
Add linkability, messaging redundancy and churn percolation to pd; report Extends the pd Blend simulator along two axes the deanonymization model opened up, adds the reports/blend/pd report of record, and fixes three correctness defects found while reviewing the result. Linkability over time (pd.linkability): - time to link an emitter ~ 30s*ln(1/(1-alpha))/(stake*q): inversely proportional to stake, so a 5% staker is linked in ~2 days and a 0.001% staker only after ~27 years; - time to certify a node's stake >= theta from the count of attributable observations (relative precision ~1/sqrt(N)): sizing a node costs 100-400x more than identifying it, and sub-0.1% stake is practically unlearnable. Both are closed forms over the exact deanonymization rates and a stake-proportional 30 s emission cadence, checked against a Monte-Carlo of the emission process in verify. Messaging redundancy (R independent cascades per emission, R = 1..4): - `redundancy` knob threaded through config/rng/propagation/engine/metrics/ sweep; a node receives from whichever cascade reaches it first, so arrival times combine element-wise. Delivery and capture both follow 1-(1-x)^R, so redundancy trades reliability against anonymity and divides time-to-link by ~R. Measured: delivery 0.34 -> 0.81 at 30% churn for R = 1 -> 4, while a 1%-staker's time to link falls 10 d -> 2.5 d. - Redundancy buys NO coverage: a cascade only delivers if the sender could already route to its relay, so every delivered cascade floods the sender's own component. Coverage is flat in R to four decimals at every degree. - Near the percolation threshold the cascades fail together rather than independently, so redundancy under-delivers against 1-(1-p1)^R there. Churn percolation (configs/percolation.yaml, verify check 7): - the flood only crosses responsive nodes, so it lives on the responsive sub-graph -- site percolation on a d-regular graph. A network survives churn only up to u_c = 1 - 1/(degree-1); measured collapse lands on the predicted threshold for every degree (3 -> 0.50, 6 -> 0.80, 16 -> 0.93), which inverts into the sizing rule degree > 1 + 1/(1-u). Correctness fixes: - redundancy delay used the fastest cascade's own full delay, which over-states it (min-max vs max-min); now the element-wise earliest arrival, reducing exactly to the single-cascade model at R = 1 (test); - the "redundancy improves coverage" claim was false in both the report and the simulator README -- removed and replaced with the measured result; - per-hop latency is degree-dependent (1.5 s at degree 16 to 2.7 s at degree 3), not a flat 1.6 s; and the worst-case observation figure was averaged over degrees -- at degree 8 and f_adv = 0.2 it is 0.83 -> 1.000. Statistics: round counts raised for resolution rather than speed -- 8000 rounds per cell in the main sweep, 9600 in the redundancy study, 6400 in the percolation study, giving SEM <= 0.009 on every delivery rate and <= 0.04 s on every delay mean. The previous redundancy grid (144 rounds/cell) produced a non-monotonic delivery curve; it is now monotonic and within 0.015 of theory. Adversary and deanonymization metrics remain closed-form and exact. reports/blend/pd: the report of record -- peering-degree trade-offs across speed, observation, eclipse, deanonymization and reliability, plus the time-to-link, stake-inference, redundancy and churn-threshold sections, with 21 figures of record and an explicit sampling-error statement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 22:37:22 +02:00
"unresponsive_frac": 0.2, "redundancy": 2, "n_rounds": 10,
"transport_jitter_mean_ms": 1.0,
"processing_lags_ms": (11.0, 51.0, 101.0), "processing_lag_probs": (0.6, 0.3, 0.1),
"link_latency_dist": "fixed", "link_latency_mean_ms": 1.0,
"coverage_pcts": (25.0,), "f_adv": 0.1, "adversary_mode": "worstcase_coverage",
"n_placements": 1, "worstcase_max_n": 5, "graph_seed": 99, "replicate": 1,
"root_seed": 7}[name]
assert alt != cur
assert dataclasses.replace(base, **{name: alt}).key() != base.key(), name
@pytest.mark.parametrize("kw", [
{"n_nodes": 999}, # odd
{"degree": 1000}, # >= n
{"blend_hops": 0}, # < 1
{"f_adv": 1.0}, # >= 1
{"max_blend_delay": -1},
{"processing_lag_probs": (0.5, 0.4)}, # doesn't sum to 1 (with default 3 lags -> len mismatch)
{"link_latency_dist": "bogus"},
{"adversary_mode": "bogus"},
])
def test_validation_rejects(kw):
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
SimConfig(**kw)
def test_sweep_grids_and_collapse():
sw = SweepConfig(n_nodes=[1000, 10000], degree=[4, 8], blend_hops=[2, 3],
max_blend_delay=[0, 3], f_adv=[0.0, 0.2],
adversary_mode=["random", "worstcase_coverage"], seeds=3)
assert len(sw.graph_cells()) == 2 * 2 * 3
assert len(sw.prop_grid()) == 2 * 2
# f_adv=0 collapses to a single (mode-irrelevant) row; f_adv=0.2 keeps both modes
assert sw.adv_grid() == [(0.0, "random"), (0.2, "random"), (0.2, "worstcase_coverage")]
def test_from_dict_rejects_unknown():
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
SweepConfig.from_dict({"nonsense": [1]})
def test_base_config_coerces_tuples():
sw = SweepConfig(base={"processing_lags_ms": [10.0, 90.0], "processing_lag_probs": [0.3, 0.7]})
cfg = sw.base_config(1000, 8, 0)
assert cfg.processing_lags_ms == (10.0, 90.0)
assert isinstance(cfg.key(), tuple)