bristinWild 83df2037ef refactor(authority): embed Authority type in TokenDefinition; fix AMM LP minting
Addresses @0x-r4bbit's review:

- lez-authority now provides an Authority(Option<[u8;32]>) newtype and an
  Ownable trait (require_owner / transfer_ownership / renounce_ownership);
  programs embed the authority slot in their account type instead of calling
  a wrapper. Replaces the old AuthoritySlot.
- TokenDefinition::Fungible embeds authority: Authority; TokenDefinition
  implements Ownable.
- Fold mint authority into NewFungibleDefinition { mint_authority: Option<AccountId> };
  remove the separate NewFungibleDefinitionWithAuthority instruction.
- mint/set_authority authorize against the definition account itself (its id
  must match the stored authority and be authorized in the tx), restoring the
  2-account mint shape and supporting PDA authorities.
- Fix AMM: the pool-definition PDA is now the LP token's mint authority, so the
  AMM mints LP at creation and on add-liquidity (was permanently revoked).
- Instruction params use AccountId; remove LP-0013-specific comments.
- Regenerate token/amm/ata/stablecoin IDLs.

Tests: lez-authority 8, token unit 56, token/amm/stablecoin/ata integration all
green under RISC0_DEV_MODE=1; fmt + clippy clean.
2026-07-02 01:18:39 +05:30

106 lines
3.1 KiB
Rust

use nssa_core::{
account::{AccountWithMetadata, Data},
program::AccountPostState,
};
use token_core::{TokenDefinition, TokenHolding};
pub fn burn(
definition_account: AccountWithMetadata,
user_holding_account: AccountWithMetadata,
amount_to_burn: u128,
) -> Vec<AccountPostState> {
assert!(
user_holding_account.is_authorized,
"Authorization is missing"
);
let mut definition = TokenDefinition::try_from(&definition_account.account.data)
.expect("Token Definition account must be valid");
let mut holding = TokenHolding::try_from(&user_holding_account.account.data)
.expect("Token Holding account must be valid");
assert_eq!(
definition_account.account_id,
holding.definition_id(),
"Mismatch Token Definition and Token Holding"
);
match (&mut definition, &mut holding) {
(
TokenDefinition::Fungible {
name: _,
metadata_id: _,
total_supply,
authority: _,
},
TokenHolding::Fungible {
definition_id: _,
balance,
},
) => {
*balance = balance
.checked_sub(amount_to_burn)
.expect("Insufficient balance to burn");
*total_supply = total_supply
.checked_sub(amount_to_burn)
.expect("Total supply underflow");
}
(
TokenDefinition::NonFungible {
name: _,
printable_supply,
metadata_id: _,
},
TokenHolding::NftMaster {
definition_id: _,
print_balance,
},
) => {
*printable_supply = printable_supply
.checked_sub(amount_to_burn)
.expect("Printable supply underflow");
*print_balance = print_balance
.checked_sub(amount_to_burn)
.expect("Insufficient balance to burn");
}
(
TokenDefinition::NonFungible {
name: _,
printable_supply,
metadata_id: _,
},
TokenHolding::NftPrintedCopy {
definition_id: _,
owned,
},
) => {
assert_eq!(
amount_to_burn, 1,
"Invalid balance to burn for NFT Printed Copy"
);
assert!(*owned, "Cannot burn unowned NFT Printed Copy");
*printable_supply = printable_supply
.checked_sub(1)
.expect("Printable supply underflow");
*owned = false;
}
_ => panic!("Mismatched Token Definition and Token Holding types"),
}
let mut definition_post = definition_account.account;
definition_post.data = Data::from(&definition);
let mut holding_post = user_holding_account.account;
holding_post.data = Data::from(&holding);
vec![
AccountPostState::new(definition_post),
AccountPostState::new(holding_post),
]
}