diff --git a/programs/amm/core/src/lib.rs b/programs/amm/core/src/lib.rs
index 8859a6a..3351493 100644
--- a/programs/amm/core/src/lib.rs
+++ b/programs/amm/core/src/lib.rs
@@ -334,6 +334,37 @@ pub fn mul_div_ceil(a: u128, b: u128, c: u128) -> u128 {
     u128::try_from(result).expect("mul_div_ceil result exceeds u128")
 }
 
+/// The constant-product output for a `SwapExactInput`, matching the AMM's on-chain
+/// pricing exactly — used by both `amm_program::swap` and the off-chain swap quote,
+/// so the preview and the executed trade agree. Fee-adjusts the input, then applies
+/// `reserve_out * effective / (reserve_in + effective)`.
+///
+/// Returns `(effective_amount_in, amount_out)`; both are `0` when the fee-adjusted
+/// input rounds to zero. Saturating: an out-of-range fee, or the impossible
+/// `reserve_in + effective` overflow (would need a reserve near `u128::MAX`),
+/// degrades to `0` output rather than panicking. Callers validate the fee tier and
+/// enforce their own nonzero / min-out checks.
+#[must_use]
+pub fn swap_exact_in_amounts(
+    amount_in: u128,
+    reserve_in: u128,
+    reserve_out: u128,
+    fee_bps: u128,
+) -> (u128, u128) {
+    let fee_multiplier = FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR.saturating_sub(fee_bps);
+    let effective_amount_in = mul_div_floor(amount_in, fee_multiplier, FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR);
+    let reserve_plus_effective = match reserve_in.checked_add(effective_amount_in) {
+        Some(v) => v,
+        None => return (effective_amount_in, 0),
+    };
+    let amount_out = if reserve_plus_effective == 0 {
+        0
+    } else {
+        mul_div_floor(reserve_out, effective_amount_in, reserve_plus_effective)
+    };
+    (effective_amount_in, amount_out)
+}
+
 /// `floor(sqrt(a * b))` computed in U256 so the `a * b` product can't overflow u128.
 ///
 /// # Panics
@@ -633,6 +664,21 @@ mod tests {
         let _ = mul_div_floor(1, 2, 0);
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn swap_exact_in_amounts_matches_constant_product() {
+        // 0.30% fee, reserves 1_000_000 in / 2_000_000 out, amount_in 10_000.
+        let (eff, out) = swap_exact_in_amounts(10_000, 1_000_000, 2_000_000, 30);
+        let expected_eff = 10_000 * (10_000 - 30) / 10_000;
+        let expected_out = 2_000_000 * expected_eff / (1_000_000 + expected_eff);
+        assert_eq!((eff, out), (expected_eff, expected_out));
+
+        // A tiny input can fee-round the effective input to zero → zero output.
+        assert_eq!(swap_exact_in_amounts(1, 1_000_000, 2_000_000, 30), (0, 0));
+
+        // Degenerate reserves saturate rather than dividing by zero.
+        assert_eq!(swap_exact_in_amounts(1, 0, 0, 30), (0, 0));
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn mul_div_ceil_small_cases() {
         assert_eq!(mul_div_ceil(6, 7, 3), 14);
diff --git a/programs/amm/src/swap.rs b/programs/amm/src/swap.rs
index 1f10252..37bcc64 100644
--- a/programs/amm/src/swap.rs
+++ b/programs/amm/src/swap.rs
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 use amm_core::{
     assert_supported_fee_tier, compute_config_pda, compute_pool_pda_seed, mul_div_ceil,
-    mul_div_floor, read_vault_fungible_balances, spot_price_q64_64, AmmConfig, FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR,
-    MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY,
+    read_vault_fungible_balances, spot_price_q64_64, swap_exact_in_amounts, AmmConfig,
+    FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR, MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY,
 };
 pub use amm_core::{compute_liquidity_token_pda_seed, compute_vault_pda_seed, PoolDefinition};
 use clock_core::CLOCK_01_PROGRAM_ACCOUNT_ID;
@@ -291,29 +291,21 @@ fn swap_logic(
     reserve_withdraw_vault_amount: u128,
     pool_id: AccountId,
 ) -> (Vec<ChainedCall>, u128, u128) {
-    let fee_multiplier = FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR
-        .checked_sub(fee_bps)
-        .expect("fee_bps exceeds fee denominator");
-    // floor(swap_amount_in * fee_multiplier / FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR), product widened to U256.
-    let effective_amount_in = mul_div_floor(swap_amount_in, fee_multiplier, FEE_BPS_DENOMINATOR);
+    // Fee-adjust the input and price via constant product. Shared with the
+    // off-chain swap quote (`amm_core::swap_exact_in_amounts`) so the preview and
+    // the executed trade agree exactly. The recorded pool reserves are updated
+    // later with the full `swap_amount_in`, so LP fees accrue inside `reserve_*`
+    // via invariant growth rather than as a vault-balance surplus over `reserve_*`.
+    let (effective_amount_in, withdraw_amount) = swap_exact_in_amounts(
+        swap_amount_in,
+        reserve_deposit_vault_amount,
+        reserve_withdraw_vault_amount,
+        fee_bps,
+    );
     assert!(
         effective_amount_in != 0,
         "Effective swap amount should be nonzero"
     );
-    // Compute the withdraw amount using the fee-adjusted input for pricing.
-    // The recorded pool reserves are updated later with the full
-    // `swap_amount_in`, so LP fees accrue inside `reserve_*` via invariant
-    // growth rather than as a separate vault balance surplus over `reserve_*`.
-    // The denominator sum stays u128 (overflows only near u128::MAX, an unstorable reserve);
-    // only the `reserve * effective` product is widened to U256.
-    let reserve_plus_effective = reserve_deposit_vault_amount
-        .checked_add(effective_amount_in)
-        .expect("reserve + effective_amount_in overflows u128");
-    let withdraw_amount = mul_div_floor(
-        reserve_withdraw_vault_amount,
-        effective_amount_in,
-        reserve_plus_effective,
-    );
 
     // Slippage check
     assert!(