Merge pull request #14 from logos-blockchain/test-transaction-ordering-independence

test: Transaction ordering independence
This commit is contained in:
Roman Zajic 2026-07-02 16:55:08 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit eb71679d57
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
16 changed files with 479 additions and 283 deletions

View File

@ -21,36 +21,13 @@ jobs:
outputs:
targets: ${{ steps.list.outputs.targets }}
steps:
- name: Build target list
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
# Derive the matrix straight from fuzz/Cargo.toml (the single source of truth),
# so new [[bin]] targets are picked up with no manual list to maintain here.
- name: Resolve fuzz target matrix
id: list
run: |
# Canonical, human-readable list (one target per line) → compact JSON array.
targets=$(jq -R -s -c 'split("\n") | map(select(length > 0))' <<'EOF'
fuzz_apply_state_diff_split_path
fuzz_block_verification
fuzz_encoding_roundtrip
fuzz_multi_block_state_sequence
fuzz_program_deployment_lifecycle
fuzz_replay_prevention
fuzz_sequencer_vs_replayer
fuzz_signature_verification
fuzz_state_diff_computation
fuzz_state_serialization
fuzz_state_transition
fuzz_stateless_verification
fuzz_transaction_decoding
fuzz_validate_execute_consistency
fuzz_witness_set_verification
fuzz_merkle_tree
fuzz_transaction_properties
fuzz_privacy_preserving_witness
fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving
fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip
fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition
EOF
)
echo "targets=$targets" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "Resolved ${targets}"
uses: ./.github/actions/resolve-targets
# ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# afl-smoke — 60-second per targets

View File

@ -20,35 +20,26 @@ jobs:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- run: python3 scripts/check_target_inventory.py
# ── Resolve the fuzz target matrix from fuzz/Cargo.toml (single source of truth) ─
resolve:
name: Resolve target matrix
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
targets: ${{ steps.list.outputs.targets }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- id: list
uses: ./.github/actions/resolve-targets
# ── Smoke fuzz: 60 s per target ─────────────────────────────────────────────
smoke-fuzz:
name: Smoke fuzz (${{ matrix.target }})
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: resolve
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
target:
- fuzz_transaction_decoding
- fuzz_stateless_verification
- fuzz_state_transition
- fuzz_block_verification
- fuzz_encoding_roundtrip
- fuzz_signature_verification
- fuzz_replay_prevention
- fuzz_state_diff_computation
- fuzz_validate_execute_consistency
- fuzz_state_serialization
- fuzz_witness_set_verification
- fuzz_program_deployment_lifecycle
- fuzz_apply_state_diff_split_path
- fuzz_multi_block_state_sequence
- fuzz_sequencer_vs_replayer
- fuzz_merkle_tree
- fuzz_transaction_properties
- fuzz_privacy_preserving_witness
- fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving
- fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip
- fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition
target: ${{ fromJSON(needs.resolve.outputs.targets) }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
@ -202,31 +193,11 @@ jobs:
regression:
name: Corpus regression (${{ matrix.target }})
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: resolve
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
target:
- fuzz_transaction_decoding
- fuzz_stateless_verification
- fuzz_state_transition
- fuzz_block_verification
- fuzz_encoding_roundtrip
- fuzz_signature_verification
- fuzz_replay_prevention
- fuzz_state_diff_computation
- fuzz_validate_execute_consistency
- fuzz_state_serialization
- fuzz_witness_set_verification
- fuzz_program_deployment_lifecycle
- fuzz_apply_state_diff_split_path
- fuzz_multi_block_state_sequence
- fuzz_sequencer_vs_replayer
- fuzz_merkle_tree
- fuzz_transaction_properties
- fuzz_privacy_preserving_witness
- fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving
- fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip
- fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition
target: ${{ fromJSON(needs.resolve.outputs.targets) }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Checkout logos-execution-zone
@ -255,6 +226,7 @@ jobs:
perf-baseline:
name: Performance baseline
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: resolve
if: github.event_name == 'schedule'
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
@ -263,28 +235,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: ./.github/actions/setup-libfuzzer
- name: Measure throughput (30 s per target)
run: |
for target in \
fuzz_transaction_decoding \
fuzz_stateless_verification \
fuzz_state_transition \
fuzz_block_verification \
fuzz_encoding_roundtrip \
fuzz_signature_verification \
fuzz_replay_prevention \
fuzz_state_diff_computation \
fuzz_validate_execute_consistency \
fuzz_state_serialization \
fuzz_witness_set_verification \
fuzz_program_deployment_lifecycle \
fuzz_apply_state_diff_split_path \
fuzz_multi_block_state_sequence \
fuzz_sequencer_vs_replayer \
fuzz_merkle_tree \
fuzz_transaction_properties \
fuzz_privacy_preserving_witness \
fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving \
fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip \
fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition; do
for target in $(jq -r '.[]' <<< '${{ needs.resolve.outputs.targets }}'); do
echo "=== $target ===" | tee -a perf_baseline.txt
cargo fuzz run "$target" -- -max_total_time=30 2>&1 \
| grep -E "exec/s|execs_per_sec" | tail -1 | tee -a perf_baseline.txt

View File

@ -139,23 +139,18 @@ jobs:
- name: Make corpus-regression wrapper executable
run: chmod +x scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh
# Build all 20 fuzz targets once before the mutation loop so that each
# mutant only needs to rebuild the mutated crate, not the fuzz harness.
# Keep this list in sync with scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh.
# Resolve the target list from fuzz/Cargo.toml (the single source of truth)
# so this workflow needs no hand-maintained list; scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh
# parses the same file, so the two stay in sync automatically.
- name: Resolve fuzz target matrix
id: list
uses: ./.github/actions/resolve-targets
# Build every fuzz target once before the mutation loop so that each mutant
# only needs to rebuild the mutated crate, not the fuzz harness.
- name: Pre-build fuzz targets
run: |
for target in \
fuzz_transaction_decoding fuzz_stateless_verification \
fuzz_state_transition fuzz_block_verification \
fuzz_encoding_roundtrip fuzz_signature_verification \
fuzz_replay_prevention fuzz_state_diff_computation \
fuzz_validate_execute_consistency fuzz_state_serialization \
fuzz_witness_set_verification fuzz_program_deployment_lifecycle \
fuzz_apply_state_diff_split_path fuzz_multi_block_state_sequence \
fuzz_sequencer_vs_replayer fuzz_merkle_tree \
fuzz_transaction_properties fuzz_privacy_preserving_witness \
fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip \
fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition; do
for target in $(jq -r '.[]' <<< '${{ steps.list.outputs.targets }}'); do
cargo fuzz build "${target}"
done

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
[Logos Execution Zone (LEZ)](https://github.com/logos-blockchain/logos-execution-zone) protocol.**
[![Rust](https://img.shields.io/badge/rust-nightly-orange?logo=rust)](rust-toolchain.toml)
[![Fuzzing](https://img.shields.io/badge/libFuzzer%20%C2%B7%20AFL%2B%2B-21%20targets-blue)](#-fuzz-targets)
[![Fuzzing](https://img.shields.io/badge/libFuzzer%20%C2%B7%20AFL%2B%2B-22%20targets-blue)](#-fuzz-targets)
[![Mutation testing](https://img.shields.io/badge/cargo--mutants-enabled-green)](.github/workflows/mutants.yml)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-lightgrey)](LICENSE-MIT)
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ lez-fuzzing/
│ └── generators.rs # Arbitrary / proptest strategies
├── fuzz/ # cargo-fuzz crate (own [workspace] sentinel)
│ ├── Cargo.toml
│ ├── fuzz_targets/ # 21 targets total — see table below
│ ├── fuzz_targets/ # 22 targets total — see table below
│ │ ├── _template.rs # Template for `just new-target`
│ │ └── fuzz_*.rs
│ └── corpus/ # Curated seed inputs (one dir per target)
@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ just fuzz-props
| 19 | `fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving` | Privacy-preserving encoding: MessageEncodingRoundtrip + TxEncodingDeterministic/NonEmpty |
| 20 | `fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip` | `NullifierSet` Borsh serialisation: NullifierSetRoundtrip (decode→encode identity for the hand-written impl) |
| 21 | `fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition` | Path B — `NSSATransaction::PrivacyPreserving` through `execute_check_on_state` with a dev-mode passing proof: reaches commitment/nullifier checks 56 + `apply_state_diff`. Asserts no-panic, StateIsolationOnFailure, PrivateStateIsolationOnFailure, CommitmentInsertion, NonceIncrementCorrectness, PostStateApplied, ReplayRejection (balance conservation intentionally not asserted — the fake proof bypasses the circuit guarantee) |
| 22 | `fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence` | Transaction ordering-independence on the shielded path: builds a *nullifier-conflicting* pair (two distinct privacy-preserving txs declaring the same nullifier) and applies it in both orders on independent clones of a seeded state, at an identical `(block_id, timestamp)`. Asserts **NoDoubleSpend** (neither ordering accepts both — the shared nullifier is spendable at most once) and **OrderIndependentAcceptance** (the count of accepted txs is the same in both orderings). The nullifier check is enforced by the state machine, not the circuit, so the dev-mode fake proof does not mask it. Requires `RISC0_DEV_MODE=1` |
Each target lives at `fuzz/fuzz_targets/<name>.rs`.
@ -167,13 +168,19 @@ cp fuzz/artifacts/fuzz_state_transition/crash-abc123-minimised \
## Adding a New Target
```bash
# Scaffold everything automatically (corpus dir, .rs file, Cargo.toml entry, CI matrix entry)
# Scaffold everything automatically (corpus dir, .rs file, Cargo.toml entry)
just new-target my_feature # creates fuzz_my_feature
```
`just new-target` calls [`scripts/add_fuzz_target.py`](scripts/add_fuzz_target.py), which
appends the `[[bin]]` entry to [`fuzz/Cargo.toml`](fuzz/Cargo.toml) and inserts the target
into every strategy matrix in [`.github/workflows/fuzz.yml`](.github/workflows/fuzz.yml).
appends the `[[bin]]` entry to [`fuzz/Cargo.toml`](fuzz/Cargo.toml) — the **single source of
truth**. Every workflow and script derives its target list from that file at runtime (the CI
matrices and build loops via the [`resolve-targets`](.github/actions/resolve-targets)
composite action, and [`scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh`](scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh) via
an inline parse), so **no CI edits are needed**. The only manual step is a prose row in the
target tables of `README.md` and [`docs/fuzzing.md`](docs/fuzzing.md);
[`scripts/check_target_inventory.py`](scripts/check_target_inventory.py) (run in CI) fails the
build if either table drifts from `fuzz/Cargo.toml`.
---

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ The `lez-fuzzing` repository is a **coverage-guided, structured mutation fuzzing
| Rich generators | [`fuzz_props::generators`](fuzz_props/src/generators.rs) adds `proptest` strategies for pathological sequences, phantom-account attacks, overflow amounts, replay sequences |
| Protocol invariants | [`fuzz_props::invariants`](fuzz_props/src/invariants.rs) expresses zero-mutation-on-rejection and replay-rejection as reusable `ProtocolInvariant` objects |
| ZK-awareness | `RISC0_DEV_MODE=1` stubs out `risc0-zkvm` proofs, enabling ~5 000200 000 exec/sec depending on target |
| 20 dedicated targets | Covers encoding, signature verification, stateless checks, state transitions, state diffs, replay prevention, validate/execute consistency, block verification, state serialization, witness-set verification, program deployment lifecycle, split-path equivalence, multi-block sequences, sequencer-vs-replayer differential, Merkle-tree invariants, transaction properties, privacy-preserving witness/encoding, and nullifier-set round-trips. Input-independent invariant checks (genesis contents, getters, system-account guard) are kept as **LEZ unit tests**, not targets — see [`docs/mutants-not-fuzzable.md`](docs/mutants-not-fuzzable.md) |
| 22 dedicated targets | Covers encoding, signature verification, stateless checks, state transitions, state diffs, replay prevention, validate/execute consistency, block verification, state serialization, witness-set verification, program deployment lifecycle, split-path equivalence, multi-block sequences, sequencer-vs-replayer differential, Merkle-tree invariants, transaction properties, privacy-preserving witness/encoding, nullifier-set round-trips, the privacy-preserving state-transition executor, and transaction ordering-independence (shielded-path nullifier double-spend across orderings). Input-independent invariant checks (genesis contents, getters, system-account guard) are kept as **LEZ unit tests**, not targets — see [`docs/mutants-not-fuzzable.md`](docs/mutants-not-fuzzable.md) |
| CI integration | GitHub Actions libFuzzer (`fuzz.yml`), AFL++ (`fuzz-afl.yml`), and mutation-testing (`mutants.yml`) workflows run on every PR / nightly |
| Pre-seeded corpus | Hundreds of minimised seed files in [`fuzz/corpus/`](fuzz/corpus/) ensure regressions are caught instantly |

View File

@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ just fuzz-regression
| `fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving` | Privacy-preserving encoding: **MessageEncodingRoundtrip**, **TxEncodingDeterministic** / **NonEmpty** | `fuzz/fuzz_targets/fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving.rs` |
| `fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip` | `NullifierSet` Borsh serialisation: **NullifierSetRoundtrip** (decode→encode identity for the hand-written impl) | `fuzz/fuzz_targets/fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip.rs` |
| `fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition` | Path B — `NSSATransaction::PrivacyPreserving` through `execute_check_on_state` with a dev-mode passing proof, reaching checks 56 (`check_commitments_are_new` / `check_nullifiers_are_valid`) and `apply_state_diff`: **No panic**, **StateIsolationOnFailure**, **PrivateStateIsolationOnFailure**, **CommitmentInsertion**, **NonceIncrementCorrectness**, **PostStateApplied**, **ReplayRejection**. Balance conservation is intentionally *not* asserted — the synthesised fake receipt bypasses the circuit guarantee. Requires `RISC0_DEV_MODE=1` | `fuzz/fuzz_targets/fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition.rs` |
| `fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence` | Ordering-independence for the shielded path — the only target that compares two *orderings* of the same transactions rather than one fixed order. `arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair` builds two distinct privacy-preserving txs declaring the **same** nullifier; they are applied in both orders (`B→C` and `C→B`) on independent clones of a commitment-seeded state, at an identical `(block_id, timestamp)` so order is the only variable. Asserts **NoDoubleSpend** (a shared nullifier is spendable at most once per ordering) and **OrderIndependentAcceptance** (the number of accepted txs is order-invariant). The nullifier guard is a state-machine check, not a circuit check, so the dev-mode fake receipt does not mask a violation. Requires `RISC0_DEV_MODE=1` | `fuzz/fuzz_targets/fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence.rs` |
---
@ -147,8 +148,7 @@ This single command does four things automatically:
|---|---|
| Creates the corpus directory | `fuzz/corpus/fuzz_my_feature/` |
| Writes a typed fuzz target template | `fuzz/fuzz_targets/fuzz_my_feature.rs` |
| Appends `[[bin]]` entry to `fuzz/Cargo.toml` | Covers **both** the libFuzzer and AFL++ lanes |
| Inserts target into every CI matrix + perf loop | `.github/workflows/fuzz.yml` |
| Appends `[[bin]]` entry to `fuzz/Cargo.toml` | Covers **both** the libFuzzer and AFL++ lanes — and every workflow/script, which derive their target lists from this file |
The generated template uses `fuzz_props::fuzz_entry!` and works with both engines
without modification.
@ -164,16 +164,26 @@ structured input, or the proptest generators from
### Step 3 — Automated registration (cargo-fuzz + CI)
`just new-target` calls [`scripts/add_fuzz_target.py`](../scripts/add_fuzz_target.py)
which:
- Appends the `[[bin]]` entry to [`fuzz/Cargo.toml`](../fuzz/Cargo.toml).
This **single entry** covers both the libFuzzer lane (`cargo fuzz build`) and
the AFL++ lane (`cargo afl build --no-default-features --features fuzzer-afl`).
- Inserts the target name into every strategy matrix and the perf-baseline shell
loop in [`.github/workflows/fuzz.yml`](../.github/workflows/fuzz.yml).
which appends the `[[bin]]` entry to [`fuzz/Cargo.toml`](../fuzz/Cargo.toml). This
**single entry** covers both the libFuzzer lane (`cargo fuzz build`) and the AFL++
lane (`cargo afl build --no-default-features --features fuzzer-afl`) — and it is the
**single source of truth** every workflow and script reads at runtime:
- The CI matrices and build loops (`fuzz.yml`, `fuzz-afl.yml`, `corpus-update.yml`,
`mutants.yml`) resolve their target list through the
[`resolve-targets`](../.github/actions/resolve-targets) composite action, which
parses `fuzz/Cargo.toml`.
- [`scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh`](../scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh) parses the
same file inline.
So a new `[[bin]]` needs **no workflow edits** — the only hand-authored places are the
prose target tables in this file and `README.md`, which
[`scripts/check_target_inventory.py`](../scripts/check_target_inventory.py) (run in CI)
checks against `fuzz/Cargo.toml`.
> [!TIP]
> **Manual fallback:** if you create a target without `just new-target`, add the
> entry yourself:
> entry yourself — that alone wires it into every lane:
>
> ```toml
> [[bin]]
@ -206,7 +216,8 @@ cd fuzz && cargo afl build \
| `fuzz/corpus/fuzz_<name>/` | Create | ✅ `just new-target` |
| `fuzz/Cargo.toml` | Add `[[bin]]` (covers both lanes) | ✅ `just new-target` |
| `Justfile` | Nothing — auto-discovers | ✅ automatic |
| `.github/workflows/fuzz.yml` | Add to 3 matrix lists | ✅ `just new-target` |
| `.github/workflows/*.yml`, `scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh` | Nothing — target lists derive from `fuzz/Cargo.toml` | ✅ automatic |
| `README.md`, `docs/fuzzing.md` | Add a prose row to the target table | ⚠️ manual (CI-gated by `check_target_inventory.py`) |
---
@ -377,8 +388,8 @@ The nightly AFL++ CI workflow has two jobs:
| Job | Triggers | Matrix |
|-----|----------|--------|
| `afl-smoke` | nightly + `workflow_dispatch` | all 21 targets, 60 s each |
| `afl-coverage-aggregate` | nightly, `needs: afl-smoke` | all 21 targets merged into one LLVM HTML report |
| `afl-smoke` | nightly + `workflow_dispatch` | all 22 targets, 60 s each |
| `afl-coverage-aggregate` | nightly, `needs: afl-smoke` | all 22 targets merged into one LLVM HTML report |
The smoke job (one matrix leg per target, on `ubuntu-latest`):
1. Builds AFL++ from source, then builds the target with `cargo afl build --no-default-features --features fuzzer-afl`
@ -388,7 +399,7 @@ The smoke job (one matrix leg per target, on `ubuntu-latest`):
The coverage-aggregate job:
1. Downloads every smoke leg's findings
2. Rebuilds all 21 targets with `RUSTFLAGS="-C instrument-coverage"`
2. Rebuilds all 22 targets with `RUSTFLAGS="-C instrument-coverage"`
3. Runs all checked-in corpus + AFL queue inputs through each binary
4. Merges every `.profraw` → one `.profdata` → a single combined HTML report via `llvm-cov show`
@ -622,6 +633,7 @@ Measured on a 4-core x86_64 Linux runner with `RISC0_DEV_MODE=1`:
| `fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving` | ~50 000 exec/sec *(estimate)* |
| `fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip` | ~100 000 exec/sec *(estimate)* |
| `fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition` | slow — dev-mode proof synthesis + verification per exec dominates runtime *(estimate)* |
| `fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence` | slow — seeds the commitment set, then synthesises proofs and executes the conflicting pair in both orderings per exec *(estimate)* |
> [!NOTE]
> Throughput figures for the five new targets are rough estimates; run `just perf-baseline`

View File

@ -157,3 +157,9 @@ name = "fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition"
path = "fuzz_targets/fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition.rs"
test = false
bench = false
[[bin]]
name = "fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence"
path = "fuzz_targets/fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence.rs"
test = false
bench = false

View File

@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
#![cfg_attr(feature = "fuzzer-libfuzzer", no_main)]
//! Fuzz target: transaction **ordering-independence** for the shielded (privacy-preserving)
//! path — the property no other target asserts.
//!
//! Every other target applies transactions in a single fixed order and checks the *result*.
//! None asks whether the *order* of two transactions can change which ones are accepted. This
//! target does: it applies a nullifier-conflicting pair in both orders on independent copies
//! of the same base state and asserts the outcome is order-independent.
//!
//! # Why the shielded path (and not native transfers)
//!
//! The original `fuzz_transaction_non_interference` proposal aimed this idea at native
//! transfers, but `V03State`'s only cross-transaction state is the append-only
//! `(CommitmentSet, NullifierSet)`; two disjoint public transfers touch only per-account maps
//! and commute trivially, so that target would be permanently green. The nullifier set is the
//! real shared state — it is what prevents double-spends — so that is where ordering can
//! actually matter.
//!
//! # The oracle
//!
//! `arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair` builds two *distinct* transactions `B` and `C` that
//! declare the **same** nullifier. A correct state machine enforces first-come-first-served:
//! whichever is applied first spends the nullifier, and the second is rejected at
//! `check_nullifiers_are_valid`. Both orderings are applied at an **identical** `(block_id,
//! timestamp)` so the *only* difference between them is transaction order — fixing a flaw in
//! the original sketch, which varied the clock per position and so could not distinguish
//! ordering effects from validity-window effects.
//!
//! Note on scope: this nullifier check is enforced by the *state machine*, not by the ZK
//! circuit, so the dev-mode synthesised proof (which bypasses the circuit) does **not** mask
//! it — unlike balance conservation, which this path deliberately never asserts.
//!
//! Requires `RISC0_DEV_MODE=1` (set by every `just fuzz` recipe) for the synthesised proofs.
//!
//! # Invariants asserted
//!
//! * **NoDoubleSpend** — in neither ordering are both conflicting transactions accepted; a
//! shared nullifier is spendable at most once. A violation is a literal double-spend.
//! * **OrderIndependentAcceptance** — the number of transactions accepted from the pair is the
//! same in both orderings. A violation means acceptance leaks across transactions depending
//! on order (order-dependent interference through global state).
use arbitrary::{Arbitrary, Unstructured};
use common::transaction::LeeTransaction;
use fuzz_props::generators::arbitrary_fuzz_state;
use fuzz_props::privacy::{arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair, arb_privacy_preserving_tx};
use nssa::{AccountId, PrivacyPreservingTransaction};
/// Apply the production stateless gate and wrap for execution; `None` drops the input.
fn gate(tx: PrivacyPreservingTransaction) -> Option<LeeTransaction> {
LeeTransaction::PrivacyPreserving(tx)
.transaction_stateless_check()
.ok()
}
fuzz_props::fuzz_entry!(|data: &[u8]| {
let mut u = Unstructured::new(data);
// Need at least two keyed accounts so the conflicting pair can use distinct signers.
let fuzz_accs = match arbitrary_fuzz_state(&mut u) {
Ok(accs) if accs.len() >= 2 => accs,
_ => return,
};
let init_accs: Vec<(AccountId, u128)> = fuzz_accs
.iter()
.map(|a| (a.account_id, a.balance))
.collect();
let mut base = fuzz_props::genesis::genesis_state(&init_accs, vec![]);
// ── Seed the commitment set ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// A nullifier only passes check 6 when its digest is in `root_history`, which starts empty
// and is seeded only once a commitment-bearing transaction applies. Reuse the
// proven-reachable generator to grow it; individual outcomes don't matter here.
let n_seed: u8 = u8::arbitrary(&mut u).unwrap_or(0) % 4;
for i in 0..n_seed {
let Ok(tx) = arb_privacy_preserving_tx(&mut u, &base, &fuzz_accs) else {
break;
};
let Some(lee) = gate(tx) else { continue };
let _ = lee.execute_check_on_state(&mut base, 1 + u64::from(i), u64::from(i));
}
// ── Build the nullifier-conflicting pair against the seeded base ─────────────────────
let Ok((tx_b, tx_c)) = arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(&mut u, &base, &fuzz_accs) else {
return;
};
// Two independent instances of each so both orderings get a fresh, un-consumed copy.
let (Some(b1), Some(c1)) = (gate(tx_b.clone()), gate(tx_c.clone())) else {
return;
};
let (Some(b2), Some(c2)) = (gate(tx_b), gate(tx_c)) else {
return;
};
// Identical clock for both orderings: the sole difference is transaction order. The pair's
// validity windows are unbounded, so the specific values are immaterial.
const BLOCK: u64 = 1;
const TS: u64 = 0;
// ── Order 1: B → C ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
let mut s_bc = base.clone();
let rb1 = b1.execute_check_on_state(&mut s_bc, BLOCK, TS).is_ok();
let rc1 = c1.execute_check_on_state(&mut s_bc, BLOCK, TS).is_ok();
// ── Order 2: C → B ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
let mut s_cb = base.clone();
let rc2 = c2.execute_check_on_state(&mut s_cb, BLOCK, TS).is_ok();
let rb2 = b2.execute_check_on_state(&mut s_cb, BLOCK, TS).is_ok();
// ── INVARIANT [NoDoubleSpend] ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// The shared nullifier must be spendable at most once, in either order.
assert!(
!(rb1 && rc1),
"INVARIANT VIOLATION [NoDoubleSpend]: both conflicting transactions accepted in order \
BC the shared nullifier was double-spent"
);
assert!(
!(rc2 && rb2),
"INVARIANT VIOLATION [NoDoubleSpend]: both conflicting transactions accepted in order \
CB the shared nullifier was double-spent"
);
// ── INVARIANT [OrderIndependentAcceptance] ───────────────────────────────────────────
// The count of accepted transactions from the pair must not depend on ordering.
let accepted_bc = u8::from(rb1) + u8::from(rc1);
let accepted_cb = u8::from(rb2) + u8::from(rc2);
assert_eq!(
accepted_bc, accepted_cb,
"INVARIANT VIOLATION [OrderIndependentAcceptance]: {accepted_bc} of the pair accepted \
as BC but {accepted_cb} as CB transaction acceptance is order-dependent",
);
});

View File

@ -321,3 +321,89 @@ pub fn arb_privacy_preserving_tx(
let witness_set = PPWitnessSet::for_message(&message, proof, &keys);
Ok(PrivacyPreservingTransaction::new(message, witness_set))
}
/// Build a minimal *pure-private* transaction: one signer, no public accounts, the given
/// commitments and nullifiers, and unbounded validity windows.
///
/// Two properties matter for the ordering-independence oracle in
/// `fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence`:
///
/// * **`public_account_ids` is empty**, so `synthesize_passing_proof` reconstructs an empty
/// `public_pre_states` and the journal does not depend on live chain state. The proof
/// therefore stays valid at check 4 even after another transaction has mutated the state —
/// i.e. it is valid whether this tx is applied *first* or *second*. That is what lets us
/// apply the same transaction in both orderings and compare outcomes soundly.
/// * The single signer's nonce is read live from `state`, so check 3c passes by construction
/// at first application; because the paired transaction uses a *different* signer, this
/// signer's nonce is untouched when this tx is applied second — so any rejection of the
/// second application is attributable to the shared nullifier, not to a nonce mismatch.
fn build_pure_private_tx(
state: &V03State,
key: &PrivateKey,
new_commitments: Vec<Commitment>,
new_nullifiers: Vec<(Nullifier, CommitmentSetDigest)>,
) -> PrivacyPreservingTransaction {
let signer_id = account_id_for_key(key);
let message = PPMessage {
public_account_ids: Vec::new(),
nonces: vec![state.get_account_by_id(signer_id).nonce],
public_post_states: Vec::new(),
encrypted_private_post_states: Vec::new(),
new_commitments,
new_nullifiers,
block_validity_window: ValidityWindow::new_unbounded(),
timestamp_validity_window: ValidityWindow::new_unbounded(),
};
let proof = synthesize_passing_proof(&message, state, &[signer_id]);
let witness_set = PPWitnessSet::for_message(&message, proof, &[key]);
PrivacyPreservingTransaction::new(message, witness_set)
}
/// Build a **nullifier-conflicting pair**: two *distinct* privacy-preserving transactions
/// (different signers, different fresh commitments) that both declare the **same** nullifier.
///
/// The shared nullifier's digest is bound to the current commitment-set root
/// (`state.commitment_set_digest()`); this only satisfies check 6's `root_history` membership
/// once a commitment-bearing transaction has already grown the set, so callers should seed the
/// state first (see the target). The two transactions are otherwise independently valid, so a
/// correct state machine must accept *at most one* of them regardless of application order —
/// the property the ordering-independence target asserts.
///
/// Returns `Err` when there are fewer than two distinct keyed accounts to draw signers from.
pub fn arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(
u: &mut Unstructured<'_>,
state: &V03State,
accounts: &[FuzzAccount],
) -> ArbResult<(PrivacyPreservingTransaction, PrivacyPreservingTransaction)> {
if accounts.len() < 2 {
return Err(arbitrary::Error::IncorrectFormat);
}
// Two distinct signer accounts so the pair's nonce checks are independent.
let i = (u8::arbitrary(u)? as usize) % accounts.len();
let mut j = (u8::arbitrary(u)? as usize) % accounts.len();
if j == i {
j = (i + 1) % accounts.len();
}
let key_b = &accounts[i].private_key;
let key_c = &accounts[j].private_key;
if account_id_for_key(key_b) == account_id_for_key(key_c) {
return Err(arbitrary::Error::IncorrectFormat);
}
// One nullifier, shared by both transactions, bound to a historical commitment-set root.
let root = state.commitment_set_digest();
let null_aid = AccountId::new(<[u8; 32]>::arbitrary(u)?);
let shared_nullifiers = vec![(Nullifier::for_account_initialization(&null_aid), root)];
// Distinct fresh commitments make the two transactions genuinely different (and keep them
// from colliding with each other on check 5).
let comm_b = Commitment::new(&AccountId::new(<[u8; 32]>::arbitrary(u)?), &arb_account(u)?);
let comm_c = Commitment::new(&AccountId::new(<[u8; 32]>::arbitrary(u)?), &arb_account(u)?);
if comm_b == comm_c {
return Err(arbitrary::Error::IncorrectFormat);
}
let tx_b = build_pure_private_tx(state, key_b, vec![comm_b], shared_nullifiers.clone());
let tx_c = build_pure_private_tx(state, key_c, vec![comm_c], shared_nullifiers);
Ok((tx_b, tx_c))
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
use arbitrary::Unstructured;
use crate::generators::FuzzAccount;
use crate::generators::{FuzzAccount, account_id_for_key};
use crate::privacy::{
arb_account, arb_privacy_preserving_tx, arb_validity_window, synthesize_passing_proof,
arb_account, arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair, arb_privacy_preserving_tx, arb_validity_window,
synthesize_passing_proof,
};
use nssa::privacy_preserving_transaction::{Message as PPMessage, WitnessSet as PPWitnessSet};
use nssa::{AccountId, PrivacyPreservingTransaction, PrivateKey};
@ -478,3 +479,140 @@ fn arb_privacy_preserving_tx_generator_invariants() {
"garbage-proof rate {garbage}/{oks} is below 1/16 (expected ~1/8)"
);
}
// ── arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// The pair builder underpins `fuzz_transaction_ordering_independence`: it must always yield
// two transactions that use *distinct* signers (so a rejection of the second application is
// attributable to the shared nullifier, not a nonce clash) and index only within the account
// set. These tests pin the account-count guard, the collision-repair branch, and the modular
// index arithmetic.
/// `n` distinct keyed fuzz accounts (`[1; 32]`, `[2; 32]`, …). Distinct nonzero scalars give
/// distinct keys and therefore distinct key-derived signer ids.
fn keyed_accounts(n: u8) -> Vec<FuzzAccount> {
(1..=n)
.map(|i| FuzzAccount {
account_id: AccountId::new([i; 32]),
balance: 1_000_000,
private_key: PrivateKey::try_new([i; 32]).expect("nonzero scalar is a valid key"),
})
.collect()
}
/// The key-derived signer ids the validator would recover from a transaction's witness set.
fn signer_ids(tx: &PrivacyPreservingTransaction) -> Vec<AccountId> {
tx.witness_set()
.signatures_and_public_keys()
.iter()
.map(|(_, pk)| AccountId::from(pk))
.collect()
}
/// The builder needs two distinct accounts: fewer than two is always rejected (before any
/// index arithmetic runs), exactly two always succeeds. This pins the `accounts.len() < 2`
/// guard against `==` / `>` / `<=` mutations.
#[test]
fn arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair_requires_two_accounts() {
let accounts = keyed_accounts(2);
let genesis: Vec<(AccountId, u128)> =
accounts.iter().map(|a| (a.account_id, a.balance)).collect();
let state = crate::genesis::genesis_state(&genesis, vec![]);
let mut rng = Rng::new();
let mut buf = vec![0_u8; 512];
rng.fill(&mut buf);
// Zero accounts: rejected by the guard. A guard mutated to `== 2` / `> 2` would fall
// through and divide by `accounts.len() == 0`, panicking — also a failure this catches.
let mut u0 = Unstructured::new(&buf);
assert!(
arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(&mut u0, &state, &[]).is_err(),
"an empty account set must be rejected"
);
// One account: still rejected — there is no room for two distinct signers.
let mut u1 = Unstructured::new(&buf);
assert!(
arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(&mut u1, &state, &accounts[..1]).is_err(),
"a single-account set must be rejected"
);
// Two accounts: must succeed. A guard mutated to `== 2` / `<= 2` would reject this.
let mut u2 = Unstructured::new(&buf);
assert!(
arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(&mut u2, &state, &accounts).is_ok(),
"two distinct accounts must yield a pair"
);
}
/// When both index bytes select the same account (`i == j`), the repair branch
/// `j = (i + 1) % len` must pick the *other* account so the pair keeps distinct signers.
/// Forcing `i == j == 0` over two accounts exercises that branch: the only correct outcome is
/// signers `{account 0, account 1}`. This pins the `j == i` test, the `(i + 1) % len` repair,
/// and the two distinctness guards (`== 2` mutations of them all reject this otherwise-valid
/// input, and the arithmetic mutations either repair to `j == i` again or index out of range).
#[test]
fn arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair_repairs_colliding_indices() {
let accounts = keyed_accounts(2);
let genesis: Vec<(AccountId, u128)> =
accounts.iter().map(|a| (a.account_id, a.balance)).collect();
let state = crate::genesis::genesis_state(&genesis, vec![]);
let mut rng = Rng::new();
let mut buf = vec![0_u8; 512];
rng.fill(&mut buf);
// The first two bytes are the `i` and `j` index draws; zero both so `i == j == 0`.
buf[0] = 0;
buf[1] = 0;
let mut u = Unstructured::new(&buf);
let (tx_b, tx_c) = arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(&mut u, &state, &accounts)
.expect("colliding indices must be repaired into two distinct signers, not rejected");
let sb = signer_ids(&tx_b);
let sc = signer_ids(&tx_c);
assert_eq!(sb.len(), 1, "tx_b must carry exactly one signer");
assert_eq!(sc.len(), 1, "tx_c must carry exactly one signer");
assert_ne!(
sb[0], sc[0],
"a conflicting pair must use two distinct signers"
);
let known: std::collections::HashSet<AccountId> = accounts
.iter()
.map(|a| account_id_for_key(&a.private_key))
.collect();
assert!(
known.contains(&sb[0]) && known.contains(&sc[0]),
"both signers must be drawn from the account set"
);
}
/// Over many random inputs the index arithmetic must stay within the account slice. A `% len`
/// mutated to `/ len` or `+ len` computes an out-of-range index and panics on `accounts[i]`;
/// the modulo keeps every draw in range and the two signers distinct.
#[test]
fn arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair_indexes_in_range() {
let accounts = keyed_accounts(2);
let genesis: Vec<(AccountId, u128)> =
accounts.iter().map(|a| (a.account_id, a.balance)).collect();
let state = crate::genesis::genesis_state(&genesis, vec![]);
let known: std::collections::HashSet<AccountId> = accounts
.iter()
.map(|a| account_id_for_key(&a.private_key))
.collect();
let mut rng = Rng::new();
let mut buf = vec![0_u8; 512];
for _ in 0..500_usize {
rng.fill(&mut buf);
let mut u = Unstructured::new(&buf);
let (tx_b, tx_c) = arb_conflicting_nullifier_pair(&mut u, &state, &accounts)
.expect("two distinct accounts always yield a pair");
let sb = signer_ids(&tx_b);
let sc = signer_ids(&tx_c);
assert_ne!(sb[0], sc[0], "conflicting-pair signers must be distinct");
assert!(
known.contains(&sb[0]) && known.contains(&sc[0]),
"signers must be drawn from the account set"
);
}
}

View File

@ -1,25 +1,27 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Fully automates registering a new cargo-fuzz / AFL++ fuzz target.
"""Register a new cargo-fuzz / AFL++ fuzz target.
Usage:
python3 scripts/add_fuzz_target.py <TARGET_NAME>
Where TARGET_NAME is the full binary name, e.g. fuzz_my_feature.
Actions performed:
1. Appends a [[bin]] entry to fuzz/Cargo.toml (one entry covers BOTH
the libFuzzer lane and the AFL++ lane no separate Cargo.toml needed)
2. Inserts TARGET_NAME into every YAML matrix block in
.github/workflows/fuzz.yml (smoke-fuzz, regression)
3. Inserts TARGET_NAME into the perf-baseline shell for-loop in
.github/workflows/fuzz.yml
A single `[[bin]]` entry in fuzz/Cargo.toml is the source of truth for BOTH
engines and for every workflow/script: the CI matrices and build loops derive
their target lists from fuzz/Cargo.toml at runtime (via the
`.github/actions/resolve-targets` composite action, or an inline parse in
`scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh`). Appending the `[[bin]]` is therefore all this
script needs to do no workflow editing.
NOTE: A single fuzz/Cargo.toml is the source of truth for both engines.
- libFuzzer build: cargo fuzz build <TARGET>
- AFL++ build: cd fuzz && cargo afl build \\
--no-default-features --features fuzzer-afl \\
--release --bin <TARGET>
The only remaining manual step is the human-authored target tables in README.md
and docs/fuzzing.md, which carry a prose description per target that cannot be
auto-generated. `scripts/check_target_inventory.py` (run in CI) guards those.
Run from the repository root.
"""
@ -49,107 +51,6 @@ def append_cargo_bin(target: str, cargo_toml: Path) -> None:
print(f" [+] fuzz/Cargo.toml — added [[bin]] {target!r}")
def insert_into_yaml_matrices(target: str, content: str) -> tuple[str, int]:
"""Insert target into YAML strategy matrix blocks.
Matches blocks of the form::
target:
- fuzz_a
- fuzz_b
and appends `` - <target>`` after the last existing entry.
"""
pattern = re.compile(
r"( target:\n(?: - fuzz_\w+\n)+)",
re.MULTILINE,
)
def add_target(m: re.Match) -> str:
return m.group(0) + f" - {target}\n"
new_content, count = pattern.subn(add_target, content)
return new_content, count
def insert_into_shell_loop(target: str, content: str) -> tuple[str, int]:
"""Insert target into a 'for target in ... ; do' shell loop.
The last entry in the loop ends with ``; do``. We change it to end with
a backslash continuation and append the new entry with ``; do``.
Example before::
fuzz_block_verification; do
After::
fuzz_block_verification \\
fuzz_new_target; do
"""
# Match the last fuzz target in the for-loop: " fuzz_xxx; do"
# Indentation: 12 spaces (inside a run: | block).
pattern = re.compile(r"( fuzz_\w+)(; do)", re.MULTILINE)
# We only want to replace the *last* occurrence (the closing entry).
matches = list(pattern.finditer(content))
if not matches:
return content, 0
if len(matches) > 1:
print(
f" ERROR: found {len(matches)} shell loops matching the pattern; "
"cannot determine which one to update. "
"Please edit .github/workflows/fuzz.yml manually.",
file=sys.stderr,
)
sys.exit(1)
m = matches[-1]
replacement = f"{m.group(1)} \\\n {target}{m.group(2)}"
new_content = content[: m.start()] + replacement + content[m.end() :]
return new_content, 1
def insert_into_workflow(target: str, workflow: Path) -> None:
"""Update all target lists in the fuzz workflow file."""
content = workflow.read_text()
if target in content:
print(f" SKIP .github/workflows/fuzz.yml — {target!r} already present")
return
# 1. YAML matrix blocks (smoke-fuzz, regression)
content, yaml_count = insert_into_yaml_matrices(target, content)
if yaml_count:
print(
f" [+] .github/workflows/fuzz.yml — inserted {target!r} into "
f"{yaml_count} YAML matrix block(s)"
)
else:
print(
f" ERROR: no YAML matrix blocks matched in {workflow} — please edit manually",
file=sys.stderr,
)
sys.exit(1)
# 2. Shell for-loop (perf-baseline)
content, loop_count = insert_into_shell_loop(target, content)
if loop_count:
print(
f" [+] .github/workflows/fuzz.yml — inserted {target!r} into "
f"perf-baseline shell loop"
)
else:
print(
f" ERROR: perf-baseline shell loop not found in {workflow} — please edit manually",
file=sys.stderr,
)
sys.exit(1)
workflow.write_text(content)
def main() -> None:
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <TARGET_NAME>", file=sys.stderr)
@ -167,17 +68,11 @@ def main() -> None:
root = Path(__file__).parent.parent # repository root
cargo_toml = root / "fuzz" / "Cargo.toml"
workflow = root / ".github" / "workflows" / "fuzz.yml"
if not cargo_toml.exists():
print(f"ERROR: {cargo_toml} not found", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
if not workflow.exists():
print(f"ERROR: {workflow} not found", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
append_cargo_bin(target, cargo_toml)
insert_into_workflow(target, workflow)
# ── Print build instructions ──────────────────────────────────────────────
print()
@ -197,13 +92,11 @@ def main() -> None:
print(" 4. Run with libFuzzer: just fuzz-one", target)
print(" Run with AFL++: just fuzz-afl", target)
print()
print(" 5. This script only edits .github/workflows/fuzz.yml. Add the")
print(" target to the other enumeration sites too, then verify with:")
print(" 5. Every workflow and script derives its target list from")
print(" fuzz/Cargo.toml, so no CI edits are needed. Only add a prose row")
print(" to the two doc tables, then verify with:")
print(" python3 scripts/check_target_inventory.py")
print(" (the same check runs in CI and will fail the build on drift):")
print(" .github/workflows/fuzz-afl.yml")
print(" .github/workflows/mutants.yml")
print(" scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh")
print(" README.md, docs/fuzzing.md")

View File

@ -1,11 +1,18 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Fail if any fuzz target registered in fuzz/Cargo.toml is missing from a
workflow / script / doc that enumerates the target list.
human-authored doc that enumerates the target list.
`fuzz/Cargo.toml` is the single source of truth: every `[[bin]] name = "fuzz_*"`
must be mentioned by name in each of the consumer files below. This guards
against the drift that `scripts/add_fuzz_target.py` cannot prevent on its own
(it only edits `.github/workflows/fuzz.yml`).
must be mentioned by name in each consumer file below.
The CI workflows and shell scripts derive their target lists *directly* from
`fuzz/Cargo.toml` at runtime, so they cannot drift and are not checked here:
- `.github/workflows/{fuzz,fuzz-afl}.yml` and the `corpus-update.yml` matrices
use the `.github/actions/resolve-targets` composite action.
- `.github/workflows/mutants.yml` calls the same action for its build loop.
- `scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh` parses `fuzz/Cargo.toml` inline.
Only the prose target tables in the docs below carry a hand-written description
per target and therefore need this drift gate.
Usage:
python3 scripts/check_target_inventory.py
@ -19,13 +26,10 @@ import re
import sys
from pathlib import Path
# Files that enumerate the full target list and must stay in sync with Cargo.toml.
# Human-authored docs whose prose target tables must stay in sync with Cargo.toml.
# (Workflows/scripts auto-derive their lists from Cargo.toml — see the module docstring.)
# Paths are relative to the repository root.
CONSUMERS = [
".github/workflows/fuzz.yml",
".github/workflows/fuzz-afl.yml",
".github/workflows/mutants.yml",
"scripts/mutants-corpus-test.sh",
"README.md",
"docs/fuzzing.md",
]

View File

@ -20,29 +20,23 @@ FUZZ_REPO="${FUZZ_REPO:-"$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/.." && pwd)"}"
CORPUS_ROOT="${FUZZ_REPO}/corpus/libfuzz"
FUZZ_DIR="${FUZZ_REPO}/fuzz"
targets=(
fuzz_transaction_decoding
fuzz_stateless_verification
fuzz_state_transition
fuzz_block_verification
fuzz_encoding_roundtrip
fuzz_signature_verification
fuzz_replay_prevention
fuzz_state_diff_computation
fuzz_validate_execute_consistency
fuzz_state_serialization
fuzz_witness_set_verification
fuzz_program_deployment_lifecycle
fuzz_apply_state_diff_split_path
fuzz_multi_block_state_sequence
fuzz_sequencer_vs_replayer
fuzz_merkle_tree
fuzz_transaction_properties
fuzz_privacy_preserving_witness
fuzz_encoding_privacy_preserving
fuzz_nullifier_set_roundtrip
fuzz_privacy_preserving_state_transition
# Derive the target list from fuzz/Cargo.toml (the single source of truth) — the same
# `[[bin]] name = "fuzz_*"` parse that .github/actions/resolve-targets uses. This keeps
# the script in sync with every workflow automatically, with no hand-maintained list.
# (A while-read loop rather than `mapfile`, so this also works under macOS' bash 3.2.)
CARGO_TOML="${FUZZ_DIR}/Cargo.toml"
targets=()
while IFS= read -r _target; do
[ -n "${_target}" ] && targets+=("${_target}")
done < <(
grep -oE 'name = "fuzz_[a-z0-9_]+"' "${CARGO_TOML}" \
| sed -E 's/.*"(fuzz_[a-z0-9_]+)"/\1/' \
| awk '!seen[$0]++'
)
if [ "${#targets[@]}" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: no fuzz_* [[bin]] targets found in ${CARGO_TOML}" >&2
exit 1
fi
# cargo-fuzz requires the nightly toolchain (-Zsanitizer=address etc.).
# When this script is called by `cargo-mutants` the working directory is the