Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bradley, Jr 23ae78a6d6 refactor: be consistent with callbacks and promises
If a function receives a callback argument then it should not return a promise
if the caller's callback will be invoked. Both invoking a callback and
returning a promise can lead to at best confusion (in code review and at
runtime) and at worst non-deterministic behavior, such as race
conditions. Also, a caller supplying a callback may not handle a returned
promise, leading to unhandled rejection errors.

Refactor all readily identified functions where a callback argument can be
supplied but the function returns a promise regardless. Make use of
`callbackify` and `promisify` where it made sense to do so during the
refactoring. Some callsites of the revised functions may have been accidentally
overlooked and still need to be updated. Some functions that take callback
arguments may execute them synchronously, at odds with control flow of a
returned promise (if a callback wasn't supplied). Such cases should be
identified and fixed so that asynchronous behavior is fully consistent whether
the caller supplies a callback or receives a promise.

Make sure promises that pass control flow to a callback ignore rejections,
since those should be handled by the callback.

Don't return promise instances unnecessarily from async functions (since they
always return promises) and change some functions that return promises to async
functions (where it's simple to do so).

Whisper was using an ad hoc promise-like `messageEvents` object. However, that
object behaved more like an observable, since promises either resolve or
reject, and only do so one time. `messageEvents` was also intertwined with
callbacks. Replace `messageEvents` with RxJS Observable. `listenTo` now returns
Observable instances and callers can subscribe to them.

`Blockchain.connect` of embarkjs could suffer from a race condition where tasks
associated with `execWhenReady` might be ongoing when `connect`'s returned
promise resolves/rejects (or a caller supplied callback fires). Attempt to
ensure that returned-promise / supplied-callback control flow proceeds only
after `execWhenReady` tasks have finished. The control flow involved
is... rather involved, and it could use some further review and refactoring.

Bump webpack and the hard-source-plugin for webpack.

[util]: https://www.npmjs.com/package/util
2019-02-13 14:27:42 -05:00
Michael Bradley, Jr 9f0a370c34 refactor: add embarkjs to the monorepo
Don't import git history of embark-framework/EmbarkJS, simply copy over the
sources. Modify `package.json`, etc. re: being situated in the monorepo.

Make use of the root babel config but extend with
`packages/embarkjs/.babelrc.js`.

Build `test/` scripts into `build-test/` and git-ignore `build-test/`.

Revise `Blockchain.connect()` so that if the caller supplies a callback then a
promise is not returned.

Revise tests to test `Blockchain.connect()` usage with and without a callback.
2019-02-08 11:58:02 -06:00