This commit introduces a new feature that enables users to calculate Smart Contract
constructor arguments lazily using an (async) function. Similar to normal Smart Contract
configurations, the return or resolved value from that function has to be either a list
of arguments in the order as they are needed for the constructor, or as an object with
named members that match the arguments individually.
```
...
development: {
deploy: {
SimpleStorage: {
args: async ({ contracts, web3, logger}) => {
// do something with `contracts` and `web3` to determine
// arguments
let someValue = await ...;
return [someValue];
// or
return {
initialValue: someValue
};
}
}
}
}
...
```
Closes#2270
Many packages in the monorepo did not specify all of their dependencies; they
were effectively relying on resolution in the monorepo's root
`node_modules`. In a production release of `embark` and `embark[js]-*` packages
this can lead to broken packages.
To fix the problem currently and to help prevent it from happening again, make
use of the `eslint-plugin-import` package's `import/no-extraneous-dependencies`
and `import/no-unresolved` rules. In the root `tslint.json` set
`"no-implicit-dependencies": true`, wich is the tslint equivalent of
`import/no-extraneous-dependencies`; there is no tslint equivalent for
`import/no-unresolved`, but we will eventually replace tslint with an eslint
configuration that checks both `.js` and `.ts` files.
For `import/no-unresolved` to work in our monorepo setup, in most packages add
an `index.js` that has:
```js
module.exports = require('./dist'); // or './dist/lib' in some cases
```
And point `"main"` in `package.json` to `"./index.js"`. Despite what's
indicated in npm's documentation for `package.json`, it's also necessary to add
`"index.js"` to the `"files"` array.
Make sure that all `.js` files that can and should be linted are in fact
linted. For example, files in `packages/embark/src/cmd/` weren't being linted
and many test suites weren't being linted.
Bump all relevant packages to `eslint@6.8.0`.
Fix all linter errors that arose after these changes.
Implement a `check-yarn-lock` script that's run as part of `"ci:full"` and
`"qa:full"`, and can manually be invoked via `yarn cylock` in the root of the
monorepo. The script exits with error if any specifiers are found in
`yarn.lock` for `embark[js][-*]` and/or `@embarklabs/*` (with a few exceptions,
cf. `scripts/check-yarn-lock.js`).
Was caused by the contract being added in case another contract uses
it as a dependency, but it automatically tried to deploy with it, so
instead, set it as `deploy: false` until we see if we need to
register it
Enable putting `$accounts[i]` in subdomain registrations, where `i`
is the index of the `getAccounts` array.
This is the same behaviour we have for contract deployement
This was caused by the fact that we add the ENS contract to the
manager when before they deploy, but the dependency resolution was
done while building the contracts, so even before.
So the solution was to add a "before build" action so that the ENS
module could add its contracts to the manager if needed.
When we introduced dappConnection to ENS, we didn't add the concept
of auto connection, like we do in the "normal" connection. This
means that when using $WEB3, the contracts connection waited for
the user to click on a button, but the ENS part called `ethereum.enable`
directly, which is confusing for the dev, because we specified to
NOT automatically connect to ethreum.
This fixes it by checking the dappAutoEnable property in contracts
config and adds it to the namesystemConfig artifact
Fixes the use of Infura to connect to the ENS contracts. When
connecting directly to Infura, it would throw with `rejected due to
project ID settings`, because it doesn't accept the VM as the domain
Instead, when passing from the proxy, it works. So I changed the
default when no dappConnection to ['$EMBARK']. I also added a
message when the error happens to help users fix it themselves
When in the testnet, we don,t register because we already have the
addresses, which is fine, but we also didn't populate the ensConfig
object which contains the important information about the addresses
and ABI.
There was a lot of lint problems in a couple of files so I cleaned
that up
## Issue 1 - “register” section missing
When the “register” section of `namesystem.json` was missing, ENS would not deploy the ENS contracts nor create the contracts’ artifacts.
### Fix 1
Fix ENS deployment routine to always deploy the ENS contracts. In the case of testnet/mainnet, the contracts’ addresses will be known and therefore will be understood as “already deployed” by the contract deployer.
## Issue 2 - “register” section exists for non-dev environment
Additionally, if a root domain was specified in the “register” section and the DApp connected to an external node where we do not own the ENS contracts (ie testnet), attempting to register a root domain would not be possible as we do not own the ENS contracts.
### Fix 2
Fix ENS deployment routine to check if we are on a network in which we own the ENS contracts. If we are not, and we have specified a “register” section, print a warning to the user that the registration will be ignored. Additionally, remove the “register” section.
Prior to this commit, registering ENS subdomains would fail due to `defaultAccount`
being null. This is because the underlying API was still relying on `blockchain:defaultAccount:get`.
However since the bigger refactor, every plugin/module is in charge of creating its own
blockchain connector instance and ensuring it has a default account.
This commit makes use of ENS' module's `webDefaultAccount` async getter to
ensure a valid default account is set when registering an ENS subdomain.
Users can turn of blockchain support if they want to using the blockchain.js
configuration. In practice however, this has never properly worked as several
places in Embark's codebase weren't actually honoring that configuration value.
This commit introduces the necessary changes so that disabling blockchain support will:
No longer generate blockchain related EmbarkJS artifacts
No longer try to deploy Smart Contracts but still compile them
This commit removes the need for `EmbarkJS.onReady()` and `EmbarkJS.Blockchain.blockchainConnector` APIs
in the ENS provider implementation and instead relies purely on vanilla `Web3`. This comes
with the effect that `EmbarkJS.Names` needs to figure out itself what to connect
to, as well as when a connection has been established.
To make that possible, `EmbarkJS.Names` now implements a similar algorithm to
`EmbarkJS.Blockchain` that tries to connect different endpoint, given a `dappConnection`
configuration.
If no `dappConnection` configuration is given via `namesystem.json`, Embark will fallback
to the same connection list that's provided in `contracts.js|json`.
wip
Turns out that, when Embark tries to replace ENS subdomains, it would fail
if `subdomains` aren't defined in the namesystem configuration.
This commit adds a safeguard so that not defining `subdomains` is fine.
This commit fixes the issue that it wasn't possible anymore to use named constructor arguments
in Smart Contract configurations.
For example, the following Smart Contract expects two constructor arguments:
```solidity
contract SomeContract {
constructor(address[] _addresses, int initialValue) public {}
}
```
The first being a list of addresses, the second one a number. This can be configured as:
```js
SomeContract: {
args: [
["$MyToken2", "$SimpleStorage"],
123
]
}
```
Notice how the order of arguments matters here. `_addresses` come first in the constructor,
so they have to be defined first in the configuration as well.
Another way to configure this is using named arguments, which is what's broken prior to this commit:
```js
SomeContract: {
args: {
initialValue: 123,
_addresses: ["$MyToken2", "$SimpleStorage"]
}
}
```
Using a notation like this ^ the order no longer matters as Embark will figure out the right
values for the constructor arguments by their names.
The reason this is broken is because there are several modules in Embark that register and
run a `deployment:contract:beforeDeploy` action, which are allowed to mutate this configuration
object. One of those modules is the `ens` module, which searches for ENS names in the arguments
and figure out whether it has to replace it with a resolved address.
One thing that particular module didn't take into account is that `args` could be either and
array, or an object and will always return an array, changing the shape of `args` in case it was
an object.
This is a problem because another module, `ethereum-blockchain-client`, another action is registered
that takes this mutated object in `determineArguments()` and ensure that, if `args` is actually an
object, the values are put in the correct position matching the constructor of the Smart Contract in
question.
One way to solve this was to use the newly introduced [priority](https://github.com/embark-framework/embark/pull/2031) and ensure
that `ens` action is executed after `ethereum-blockchain-client`'s.
However, the actual bug here is that the ENS module changes the shape of `args` in the first place,
so this commit ensures that it preserves it.
* chore(@embark/): move embarkjs packages to their own folder
* chore(@embark/): rename embark-ui folder to cockpit
* chore(@embark/): rename packages already in logical folders to remove embark- prefix
chore(@embark/): rename packages already in logical folders to remove embark- prefix
update package.json files to use correct eslint config
remove core/* from package.json workspaces
Pascal Precht
Michael Bradley, Jr
Jonathan Rainville
emizzle
Iuri Matias