Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Mastro 6df5a7cf54 [chore] clean up `array[32, byte]` types
- rename `ContractId` to `SlotId`
- add `RequestId`, `PurchaseId`, `Nonce` types as aliases of `array[32, byte]`
- rename `Proving.contracts` to `Proving.slots`
- change signatures of `isSlotCancelled` and `isCancelled` to use `SlotId` and `RequestId` types, respectively.
- change all references to `RequestId`, `SlotId`, and `PurchaseId`
2022-08-26 13:29:09 +10:00
Mark Spanbroek 67e4a28ed0 [contracts] Replace fulfillRequest() by fillSlot() 2022-08-08 14:00:55 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 360c03e7c4 [contracts] Rename: maxPrice -> reward 2022-08-08 14:00:55 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 96ca1de768 Cleanup: remove StorageOffer everywhere 2022-07-20 13:43:20 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek e352a181e4 [contracts] Update to latest dagger-contracts 2022-07-20 13:43:20 +02:00
Dmitriy Ryajov 56b80d6f6d
Por serialize (#106)
* move por into storage proofs

* use SeekableStream

* adding serialization for por

* remove leftovers

* add empty block support

* add basic por test

* rename block exchange for consistency

* add storageproofstests

* moving timing to storageproofs

* fix imports

* fix imports

* fix imports

* add top level exports

* move delete blocks helper to helpers

* more import/export fixes

* cleanup

* more import fixes

* fix unused warnings

* detect corrupt blocks tests

* add serialization tests

* move init method around

* bump asynctest

* fix CID version

* get rid of warning

* wip: fix CI

* increase CI timeout
2022-05-23 23:24:15 -06:00
Michael Bradley 209343087c
Change every dagger to codex (#102) 2022-05-19 13:56:03 -06:00
Mark Spanbroek 7f9fa0a183 [tests] move ethertest module up one level
It's going to be used by both contract and integration tests.
2022-05-19 10:38:19 +02:00
markspanbroek b88561e090
Subscribe to proof submissions (#83)
* Update dagger-contracts

* [proving] rename ProofTiming -> Proofs

* Update nim-ethers to 0.1.4

* [proving] Subscribe to proof submissions

* [proving] support proof submission through the Proving abstraction
2022-04-13 10:41:48 -06:00
markspanbroek 1a3003e043
Update to latest dagger-contracts (#78)
- StorageRequest struct has changed

- StorageRequested event has changed,
  it no longer returns the entire request,
  but only the id and the ask
2022-04-11 12:03:55 -06:00
markspanbroek 03fa370624
Proving (#66)
* Add Proving object, which maintains contract id's to watch

* [proving] invoke callback when proof is required

# Conflicts:
#	dagger/por/timing/periods.nim
#	dagger/por/timing/prooftiming.nim

* [proving] check proof requirements for all our contracts

# Conflicts:
#	tests/dagger/helpers/mockprooftiming.nim

* Update vendor/dagger-contracts

* [proving] call onProofRequired() when proof is required soon

* [proving] stop checking contracts that have ended

* [proving] Remove duplicated funcs

* [proving] Implement ProofTiming on top of smart contract

* [proving] Fix race condition in waitUntilNextPeriod()

Sometimes waitUntilNextPeriod would take a while to
determine the current period, leading to unexpected results.

Splits waitUntilNextPeriod() into getCurrentPeriod()
and waitUntilPeriod(), to ensure that we're really waiting
for the period that we think we're waiting for.
2022-04-08 15:58:16 -06:00
Mark Spanbroek efb4f5c375 [contracts] Update to new marketplace design 2022-03-28 11:59:01 +02:00
Eric Mastro 2e5c28781c feat: integrate dagger contracts
Integrate dagger contracts from `nim-dagger-contracts` repo.

Add `dagger-contracts`, `nim-web3`, and all of `nim-web3`’s transitive deps as submodule deps to `nim-dagger`. Note: `nim-web3` and its transitive deps may no longer be needed when we switch to `nim-ethers`.

Add a `testContracts` nimble task to test all of the contracts functionality. Namely, this spins up an ethereum simulator, deploys the contracts (in `dagger-contracts`), runs the contract tests, and finally, regardless of success/error, kills the ethereum sim processes. The nimble task can be run with `./env.sh nimble testContracts`.

We also tested `nim-dagger-contracts` as a submodule dep of `nim-dagger`, and while the tests run as expected, the preference is to merge `nim-dagger-contracts` inside of `nim-dagger` for ease of parallel development. There’s also a high probability that `nim-dagger-contracts` is not being used as a dep by other projects. Are there any strong objections to this?

Co-authored-by: Michael Bradley <michaelsbradleyjr@gmail.com>
2022-02-04 15:34:56 +11:00