Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
markspanbroek b88561e090
Subscribe to proof submissions (#83)
* Update dagger-contracts

* [proving] rename ProofTiming -> Proofs

* Update nim-ethers to 0.1.4

* [proving] Subscribe to proof submissions

* [proving] support proof submission through the Proving abstraction
2022-04-13 10:41:48 -06:00
markspanbroek 1a3003e043
Update to latest dagger-contracts (#78)
- StorageRequest struct has changed

- StorageRequested event has changed,
  it no longer returns the entire request,
  but only the id and the ask
2022-04-11 12:03:55 -06:00
markspanbroek 03fa370624
Proving (#66)
* Add Proving object, which maintains contract id's to watch

* [proving] invoke callback when proof is required

# Conflicts:
#	dagger/por/timing/periods.nim
#	dagger/por/timing/prooftiming.nim

* [proving] check proof requirements for all our contracts

# Conflicts:
#	tests/dagger/helpers/mockprooftiming.nim

* Update vendor/dagger-contracts

* [proving] call onProofRequired() when proof is required soon

* [proving] stop checking contracts that have ended

* [proving] Remove duplicated funcs

* [proving] Implement ProofTiming on top of smart contract

* [proving] Fix race condition in waitUntilNextPeriod()

Sometimes waitUntilNextPeriod would take a while to
determine the current period, leading to unexpected results.

Splits waitUntilNextPeriod() into getCurrentPeriod()
and waitUntilPeriod(), to ensure that we're really waiting
for the period that we think we're waiting for.
2022-04-08 15:58:16 -06:00
Mark Spanbroek 71f25d40c7 [market] offerStorage() returns submitted offer 2022-04-04 11:29:32 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 94e34e7d28 [market] requestStorage() returns submitted request 2022-04-04 11:29:32 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek dd89a55351 [market] Add Market.getTime() 2022-04-04 11:29:32 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 75ec8c0bfd [market] wait until request/offer expires 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 8ff748eff8 [market] select a storage offer 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 5ea64522d8 [market] subscribe to offers for a certain request 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 9f76e714a2 [market] submit storage offers 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek e52153e2ba [market] Require a storage contract with a signer 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek e78a0fb43e [contracts] Wrap contracts in Market abstraction 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 9ade3fdd37 [contracts] StorageRequest/Offer is object instead of tuple 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek a3fdd35f73 [contracts] Split marketplace.nim into requests.nim and offers.nim 2022-04-04 10:03:46 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 28294d431a [contracts] Tests now also work in Windows 2022-03-28 11:59:01 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek b8e013e439 [contracts] Add Readme 2022-03-28 11:59:01 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek efb4f5c375 [contracts] Update to new marketplace design 2022-03-28 11:59:01 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 87bd947d3d [contracts] Update to new collateral design 2022-03-28 11:59:01 +02:00
Mark Spanbroek 8d0f9775b5 [contracts] Simplify hardhat node startup 2022-03-28 11:59:01 +02:00
Eric Mastro 2e5c28781c feat: integrate dagger contracts
Integrate dagger contracts from `nim-dagger-contracts` repo.

Add `dagger-contracts`, `nim-web3`, and all of `nim-web3`’s transitive deps as submodule deps to `nim-dagger`. Note: `nim-web3` and its transitive deps may no longer be needed when we switch to `nim-ethers`.

Add a `testContracts` nimble task to test all of the contracts functionality. Namely, this spins up an ethereum simulator, deploys the contracts (in `dagger-contracts`), runs the contract tests, and finally, regardless of success/error, kills the ethereum sim processes. The nimble task can be run with `./env.sh nimble testContracts`.

We also tested `nim-dagger-contracts` as a submodule dep of `nim-dagger`, and while the tests run as expected, the preference is to merge `nim-dagger-contracts` inside of `nim-dagger` for ease of parallel development. There’s also a high probability that `nim-dagger-contracts` is not being used as a dep by other projects. Are there any strong objections to this?

Co-authored-by: Michael Bradley <michaelsbradleyjr@gmail.com>
2022-02-04 15:34:56 +11:00