From cda04486114559af1a823b1814d406c0fdf33b14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gmega <giuliano.mega@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:37:53 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] check for both strategies in attribute inheritance test

---
 tests/codex/testmanifest.nim | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/codex/testmanifest.nim b/tests/codex/testmanifest.nim
index fc74d817..3393fa08 100644
--- a/tests/codex/testmanifest.nim
+++ b/tests/codex/testmanifest.nim
@@ -77,25 +77,33 @@ checksuite "Manifest":
 
 
 suite "Manifest - Attribute Inheritance":
-  let
-    base = Manifest.new(
-      treeCid = Cid.example,
-      blockSize = 1.MiBs,
-      datasetSize = 100.MiBs
-    )
-    protected = Manifest.new(
-      manifest = base,
+  proc makeProtectedManifest(strategy: StrategyType): Manifest =
+    Manifest.new(
+      manifest = Manifest.new(
+        treeCid = Cid.example,
+        blockSize = 1.MiBs,
+        datasetSize = 100.MiBs,
+      ),
       treeCid = Cid.example,
       datasetSize = 200.MiBs,
       ecK = 1,
       ecM = 1,
-      strategy = SteppedStrategy
+      strategy = strategy
     )
-    verifiable = Manifest.new(
-      manifest = protected,
+
+  test "Should preserve interleaving strategy for protected manifest in verifiable manifest":
+    var verifiable = Manifest.new(
+      manifest = makeProtectedManifest(SteppedStrategy),
       verifyRoot = Cid.example,
       slotRoots = @[Cid.example, Cid.example]
     ).tryGet()
 
-  test "Should preserve interleaving strategy for protected manifest in verifiable manifest":
     check verifiable.protectedStrategy == SteppedStrategy
+
+    verifiable = Manifest.new(
+      manifest = makeProtectedManifest(LinearStrategy),
+      verifyRoot = Cid.example,
+      slotRoots = @[Cid.example, Cid.example]
+    ).tryGet()
+
+    check verifiable.protectedStrategy == LinearStrategy