fix botched merge
This commit is contained in:
parent
102ecdf571
commit
ba80eaf8a3
|
@ -38,29 +38,12 @@ marketplacesuite "Hosts submit regular proofs":
|
|||
let totalPeriods = 50
|
||||
let datasetSizeInBlocks = 2
|
||||
|
||||
<<<<<<< HEAD
|
||||
proc waitUntilPurchaseIsStarted(
|
||||
proofProbability: uint64 = 3,
|
||||
duration: uint64 = 100 * period,
|
||||
expiry: uint64 = 30
|
||||
) {.async: (handleException: true, raises: [AsyncExceptionError]).} =
|
||||
discard client2.postAvailability(
|
||||
size=0xFFFFF.u256,
|
||||
duration=duration.u256,
|
||||
minPrice=300.u256,
|
||||
maxCollateral=200.u256
|
||||
)
|
||||
let cid = client1.upload("some file contents").get
|
||||
let expiry = (await ethProvider.currentTime()) + expiry.u256
|
||||
let id = client1.requestStorage(
|
||||
=======
|
||||
let data = await RandomChunker.example(blocks=1)
|
||||
createAvailabilities(data.len, totalPeriods.periods)
|
||||
|
||||
let cid = client0.upload(data).get
|
||||
|
||||
let purchaseId = await client0.requestStorage(
|
||||
>>>>>>> master
|
||||
cid,
|
||||
duration=totalPeriods.periods,
|
||||
origDatasetSizeInBlocks = datasetSizeInBlocks)
|
||||
|
@ -78,72 +61,7 @@ marketplacesuite "Hosts submit regular proofs":
|
|||
await subscription.unsubscribe()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<<<<<<< HEAD
|
||||
proc purchaseStateIs(client: CodexClient, id: PurchaseId, state: string): bool =
|
||||
client.getPurchase(id).option.?state == some state
|
||||
|
||||
var marketplace: Marketplace
|
||||
var period: uint64
|
||||
var slotId: SlotId
|
||||
|
||||
setup:
|
||||
marketplace = Marketplace.new(Marketplace.address, ethProvider)
|
||||
let config = await marketplace.config()
|
||||
period = config.proofs.period.truncate(uint64)
|
||||
slotId = SlotId(array[32, byte].default) # ensure we aren't reusing from prev test
|
||||
|
||||
# Our Hardhat configuration does use automine, which means that time tracked by `ethProvider.currentTime()` is not
|
||||
# advanced until blocks are mined and that happens only when transaction is submitted.
|
||||
# As we use in tests ethProvider.currentTime() which uses block timestamp this can lead to synchronization issues.
|
||||
await ethProvider.advanceTime(1.u256)
|
||||
|
||||
proc periods(p: Ordinal | uint): uint64 =
|
||||
when p is uint:
|
||||
p * period
|
||||
else: p.uint * period
|
||||
|
||||
proc advanceToNextPeriod {.async.} =
|
||||
let periodicity = Periodicity(seconds: period.u256)
|
||||
let currentPeriod = periodicity.periodOf(await ethProvider.currentTime())
|
||||
let endOfPeriod = periodicity.periodEnd(currentPeriod)
|
||||
await ethProvider.advanceTimeTo(endOfPeriod + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
proc waitUntilPurchaseIsStarted(
|
||||
proofProbability: uint64 = 1,
|
||||
duration: uint64 = 12.periods,
|
||||
expiry: uint64 = 4.periods
|
||||
) {.async: (handleException: true, raises: [AsyncExceptionError]).} =
|
||||
|
||||
if clients().len < 1 or providers().len < 1:
|
||||
raiseAssert("must start at least one client and one ethProvider")
|
||||
|
||||
let client = clients()[0].restClient
|
||||
let storageProvider = providers()[0].restClient
|
||||
|
||||
discard storageProvider.postAvailability(
|
||||
size=0xFFFFF.u256,
|
||||
duration=duration.u256,
|
||||
minPrice=300.u256,
|
||||
maxCollateral=200.u256
|
||||
)
|
||||
let cid = client.upload("some file contents " & $ getTime().toUnix).get
|
||||
let expiry = (await ethProvider.currentTime()) + expiry.u256
|
||||
# avoid timing issues by filling the slot at the start of the next period
|
||||
await advanceToNextPeriod()
|
||||
let id = client.requestStorage(
|
||||
cid,
|
||||
expiry=expiry,
|
||||
duration=duration.u256,
|
||||
proofProbability=proofProbability.u256,
|
||||
collateral=100.u256,
|
||||
reward=400.u256
|
||||
).get
|
||||
check eventually client.purchaseStateIs(id, "started")
|
||||
let purchase = client.getPurchase(id).get
|
||||
slotId = slotId(purchase.requestId, 0.u256)
|
||||
=======
|
||||
marketplacesuite "Simulate invalid proofs":
|
||||
>>>>>>> master
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: these are very loose tests in that they are not testing EXACTLY how
|
||||
# proofs were marked as missed by the validator. These tests should be
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue