fix `updateRecord`

- support incrementing seqNo
- support updating with new record
This commit is contained in:
Dmitriy Ryajov 2022-09-12 16:22:56 -06:00
parent d90f0a03b9
commit 2d93fa9e69
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: DA8C680CE7C657A4
2 changed files with 39 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@ -222,16 +222,29 @@ func getRecord*(d: Protocol): SignedPeerRecord =
## Get the SPR of the local node.
d.localNode.record
proc updateRecord*(d: Protocol, newSpr: SignedPeerRecord): DiscResult[void] =
proc updateRecord*(
d: Protocol,
spr: Option[SignedPeerRecord] = SignedPeerRecord.none): DiscResult[void] =
## Update the ENR of the local node with provided `enrFields` k:v pairs.
##
info "Updated discovery SPR", uri=toURI(newSpr)
d.localNode.record = newSpr
ok()
if spr.isSome:
let
newSpr = spr.get()
seqNo = d.localNode.record.seqNum
info "Updated discovery SPR", uri = toURI(newSpr)
d.localNode.record = newSpr
d.localNode.record.data.seqNo = seqNo
? d.localNode.record.incSeqNo(d.privateKey)
# TODO: Would it make sense to actively ping ("broadcast") to all the peers
# we stored a handshake with in order to get that ENR updated?
ok()
proc sendResponse(d: Protocol, dstId: NodeId, dstAddr: Address,
message: SomeMessage, reqId: RequestId) =
## send Response using the specifid reqId

View File

@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ proc seqNum*(r: SignedPeerRecord): uint64 =
r.data.seqNo
proc fromBytes(r: var SignedPeerRecord, s: openArray[byte]): bool =
let decoded = SignedPeerRecord.decode(@s)
if decoded.isErr:
error "Error decoding SignedPeerRecord", error = decoded.error
@ -47,22 +46,21 @@ proc get*(r: SignedPeerRecord, T: type PublicKey): Option[T] =
r.envelope.publicKey.some
proc incSeqNo*(
r: var SignedPeerRecord,
pk: PrivateKey): RecordResult[void] =
r: var SignedPeerRecord,
pk: PrivateKey): RecordResult[void] =
r.data.seqNo.inc()
r = ? SignedPeerRecord.init(pk, r.data).mapErr(
(e: CryptoError) =>
("Error initialising SignedPeerRecord with incremented seqNo: " &
$e).cstring
)
("Error initializing SignedPeerRecord with incremented seqNo: " & $e).cstring)
ok()
proc update*(r: var SignedPeerRecord, pk: crypto.PrivateKey,
ip: Option[ValidIpAddress],
tcpPort, udpPort: Option[Port] = none[Port]()):
RecordResult[void] =
proc update*(
r: var SignedPeerRecord,
pk: crypto.PrivateKey,
ip: Option[ValidIpAddress],
tcpPort, udpPort: Option[Port] = none[Port]()):
RecordResult[void] =
## Update a `SignedPeerRecord` with given ip address, tcp port, udp port and optional
## custom k:v pairs.
##
@ -110,7 +108,6 @@ proc update*(r: var SignedPeerRecord, pk: crypto.PrivateKey,
transProtoPort = udpPort.get
updated = MultiAddress.init(ipAddr, transProto, transProtoPort)
else:
let
existing = r.data.addresses[0].address
@ -158,8 +155,7 @@ proc update*(r: var SignedPeerRecord, pk: crypto.PrivateKey,
r = ? SignedPeerRecord.init(pk, r.data)
.mapErr((e: CryptoError) =>
("Failed to update SignedPeerRecord: " & $e).cstring
)
("Failed to update SignedPeerRecord: " & $e).cstring)
return ok()
@ -223,11 +219,13 @@ proc toBase64*(r: SignedPeerRecord): string =
proc toURI*(r: SignedPeerRecord): string = "spr:" & r.toBase64
proc init*(T: type SignedPeerRecord, seqNum: uint64,
pk: PrivateKey,
ip: Option[ValidIpAddress],
tcpPort, udpPort: Option[Port]):
RecordResult[T] =
proc init*(
T: type SignedPeerRecord,
seqNum: uint64,
pk: PrivateKey,
ip: Option[ValidIpAddress],
tcpPort, udpPort: Option[Port]):
RecordResult[T] =
## Initialize a `SignedPeerRecord` with given sequence number, private key, optional
## ip address, tcp port, udp port, and optional custom k:v pairs.
##
@ -268,7 +266,9 @@ proc init*(T: type SignedPeerRecord, seqNum: uint64,
let ma = MultiAddress.init(ipAddr, proto, protoPort)
let pr = PeerRecord.init(peerId, @[ma], seqNum)
SignedPeerRecord.init(pk, pr).mapErr((e: CryptoError) => ("Failed to init SignedPeerRecord: " & $e).cstring)
SignedPeerRecord.init(pk, pr)
.mapErr(
(e: CryptoError) => ("Failed to init SignedPeerRecord: " & $e).cstring)
proc contains*(r: SignedPeerRecord, fp: (string, seq[byte])): bool =
# TODO: use FieldPair for this, but that is a bit cumbersome. Perhaps the
@ -281,4 +281,5 @@ proc contains*(r: SignedPeerRecord, fp: (string, seq[byte])): bool =
debugEcho "`contains` is not yet implemented for SignedPeerRecords"
return false
proc `==`*(a, b: SignedPeerRecord): bool = a.data == b.data
proc `==`*(a, b: SignedPeerRecord): bool =
a.data == b.data